45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2007
DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing the Features and Performances of Historic Airplanes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, V 2 design demonstrates the highest out‐of‐plane stiffness under pressure. Since the lift force on airfoils is significantly higher than drag force (the lift‐to‐drag ratio is commonly in the range of 10–20 [ 68 ] ) and the smallest dimension of the wing is its height, out‐of‐plane stiffness is the most critical stiffness among the others. It is worth mentioning that the previously‐reported curved rib design with a higher thickness (h = 3.85mm) also outperforms the basic design in out‐of‐plane stiffness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, V 2 design demonstrates the highest out‐of‐plane stiffness under pressure. Since the lift force on airfoils is significantly higher than drag force (the lift‐to‐drag ratio is commonly in the range of 10–20 [ 68 ] ) and the smallest dimension of the wing is its height, out‐of‐plane stiffness is the most critical stiffness among the others. It is worth mentioning that the previously‐reported curved rib design with a higher thickness (h = 3.85mm) also outperforms the basic design in out‐of‐plane stiffness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%