2013
DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/87/03/038112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing the Schrödinger groups

Abstract: We discuss the maximum kinematical invariance group of the quantum harmonic oscillator from the viewpoint of a Ermakov-type system. As an example, we consider a six-parameter family of the square integrable oscillator wave functions, which appears to be not obtainable by standard separation of variables. Finally, the invariance group of the generalized driven harmonic oscillator is shown to be isomorphic to the corresponding Schrödinger group of the free particle.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, the probability density |ψ (x, t)| 2 of the solution (1.2) is obviously moving with time, somewhat contradicting to the standard textbooks [21], [23], [38], [47], [55], -an elementary Mathematica simulation reveals such space oscillations for the simplest "dynamic oscillator states" [44], [45] (see Appendix A for the Mathematica source code). The same is true for the probability distribution of the particle linear momentum due to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At the same time, the probability density |ψ (x, t)| 2 of the solution (1.2) is obviously moving with time, somewhat contradicting to the standard textbooks [21], [23], [38], [47], [55], -an elementary Mathematica simulation reveals such space oscillations for the simplest "dynamic oscillator states" [44], [45] (see Appendix A for the Mathematica source code). The same is true for the probability distribution of the particle linear momentum due to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These "missing" solutions can be derived analytically in a unified approach to generalized harmonic oscillators (see, for example, [9], [10], [39] and the references therein). They are also verified by a direct substitution with the aid of Mathematica computer algebra system [33], [45], [62]. (The simplest special case µ 0 = β 0 = 1 and α 0 = γ 0 = δ 0 = ε 0 = κ 0 = 0 reproduces the textbook solution obtained by the separation of variables [21], [23], [38], [47]; see also the original Schrödinger paper [55]; and the shape-preserving oscillator evolutions occur when α 0 = 0 and β 0 = 1.…”
Section: −(β(T)x+ε(t))mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the latter case, in [36], [37] and [38], multiparameter solutions in the spirit of Marhic in [30] have been presented. The parameters for the Riccati system arose originally in the process of proving convergence to the initial data for the Cauchy initial value problem Equation (1) with h(t) = 0 and in the process of finding a general solution of a Riccati system [38] and [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters for the Riccati system arose originally in the process of proving convergence to the initial data for the Cauchy initial value problem Equation (1) with h(t) = 0 and in the process of finding a general solution of a Riccati system [38] and [39]. In addition, Ermakov systems with solutions containing parameters [36] have been used successfully to construct solutions for the generalized harmonic oscillator with a hidden symmetry [37], and they have also been used to present Galilei transformation, pseudoconformal transformation and others in a unified manner, see [37]. More recently, they have been used in [40] to show spiral and breathing solutions and solutions with bending for the paraxial wave equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%