2020
DOI: 10.3390/rs12172735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing Three Decades of Land Use and Land Cover Changes in Brazilian Biomes with Landsat Archive and Earth Engine

Abstract: Brazil has a monitoring system to track annual forest conversion in the Amazon and most recently to monitor the Cerrado biome. However, there is still a gap of annual land use and land cover (LULC) information in all Brazilian biomes in the country. Existing countrywide efforts to map land use and land cover lack regularly updates and high spatial resolution time-series data to better understand historical land use and land cover dynamics, and the subsequent impacts in the country biomes. In this study, we des… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
368
0
46

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 889 publications
(586 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
5
368
0
46
Order By: Relevance
“…The MapBiomas initiative, a collaborative consortium of multiple organizations initiated in Brazil, has produced annual land use and land cover (LULC) time series based on 30-m-resolution Landsat data using random forests machine learning algorithm, in which native and exotic tree covers are differentiated and the age of native forests is estimated ( 21 ). This novel methodological approach offers valuable opportunities for mapping native forests’ restoration and conservation dynamics ( 22 , 23 ), which have a critical role in tracking the progress of ambitious restoration and tree planting commitments such as the Bonn Challenge and the 1t.org of the World Economic Forum, as well as the upcoming United Nations’ Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MapBiomas initiative, a collaborative consortium of multiple organizations initiated in Brazil, has produced annual land use and land cover (LULC) time series based on 30-m-resolution Landsat data using random forests machine learning algorithm, in which native and exotic tree covers are differentiated and the age of native forests is estimated ( 21 ). This novel methodological approach offers valuable opportunities for mapping native forests’ restoration and conservation dynamics ( 22 , 23 ), which have a critical role in tracking the progress of ambitious restoration and tree planting commitments such as the Bonn Challenge and the 1t.org of the World Economic Forum, as well as the upcoming United Nations’ Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm classifies targets using the spectral response of each Brazilian biome from the database, automatically classifying areas with the same spectral pattern [37]. The applied method, fully described in MapBiomas 2020b and in Souza Junior et al 2020 [26,36], distinguishes 22 LULC classes in the most detailed classification level (level 3).…”
Section: Land Use and Land Cover Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advance of remote sensing, image processing, and machine learning techniques, novel approaches have been developed to complement the Brazilian official monitoring system to track annual deforestation in the Amazon. These efforts are highlighted in the MapBiomas project, which consists of a multi-disciplinary network responsible for providing annual LULC maps for the entire Brazilian territory since the 1980s using the Landsat Archive and the Google Earth Engine platform [25,26], allowing the analysis of LULCC for long time periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, Long-term (1950Long-term ( -1990) mean annual rainfall obtained from the meteorological stations used by Alvares et al (2013). f Landsatbased land use and land cover map for 2017 provided by the MapBiomas Project (Souza et al 2020) April and September are the driest months in São Paulo State (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%