2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsir.2020.100114
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction and physical fit analysis of fragmented skeletal remains using 3D imaging and printing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a casework context, the ability to share data between practitioners, and/or re-assess material after being signed out of the laboratory, cannot be understated, especially in a DVI situation (de Boer et al, 2019). Where required, accurate 3D osteological models can also be printed based on CT data of an appropriate resolution (e.g., Collings & Brown, 2020;Robles et al, 2020;and see below). Such data combined not only contribute to casework requirements, but facilitate quantitative research used to inform forensic practice; for example, including (but not limited to) developing contemporary population specific anthropological standards (Franklin & Blau, 2020) and assessing trauma and/or pathology (e.g., Biggs et al, 2020;Spies et al, 2021).…”
Section: Radiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a casework context, the ability to share data between practitioners, and/or re-assess material after being signed out of the laboratory, cannot be understated, especially in a DVI situation (de Boer et al, 2019). Where required, accurate 3D osteological models can also be printed based on CT data of an appropriate resolution (e.g., Collings & Brown, 2020;Robles et al, 2020;and see below). Such data combined not only contribute to casework requirements, but facilitate quantitative research used to inform forensic practice; for example, including (but not limited to) developing contemporary population specific anthropological standards (Franklin & Blau, 2020) and assessing trauma and/or pathology (e.g., Biggs et al, 2020;Spies et al, 2021).…”
Section: Radiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it has been used to identify pediatric rib fractures in cases of child abuse [10,11] or to evaluate full-thickness fractures of the skull in cases involving blunt force trauma [12]. Recently, the application of 3D printing technology for court use has been proposed, creating models of fragmented skeletal remains or bone injuries based on micro-CT scans, to replicate the bone surface geometry with a sub-millimeter accuracy [13][14][15].…”
Section: Fracturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micro-CT is a non-invasive, transmissive scan method that captures volumetric data using x-radiation of a sample that rotates within the scan chamber [ 13 ]. Its value in casework has been presented for histological analysis such as species identification [ 14 ], for soft and hard tissue examination in forensic pathology [ 15 ], for physical fit analysis of bone fragments [ 16 ], and for cutmark analysis [ 3 , 17 ]. The analysis of micromorphological details is important for evaluative interpretation in forensic casework in terms of indicating possible trauma (e.g., cutmarks or striations), taphonomy (e.g., heat induced bones fractures), or pathology (e.g., evidence of disease or malnutrition).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%