“…In addition to the seismic and geodetic slip models presented in this study, numerous other slip distributions have been published for the Illapel earthquake. These include models inverted from a variety of data sets: teleseismic broadband waveforms [ Ye et al ., ; Lee et al ., ], teleseismic broadband data augmented by tsunami observations [ Heidarzadeh et al ., ; Li et al ., ], joint teleseismic broadband, regional strong motion, high‐rate GPS, static GPS, and InSAR [ Tilmann et al ., ], joint high‐rate GPS, strong motion, InSAR, and tsunami [ Melgar et al ., ], joint tsunami and static GPS and InSAR [ An and Meng , ; Williamson et al ., ], and static geodetic observations alone [ Barnhart et al ., ; Ruiz et al ., ; Feng et al ., ]. Because the various geophysical observations are sensitive to different aspects of the deforming subduction system and the model setups and inversion approaches differ, there are differences in the precise timing (in kinematic models), distribution, and amount of slip.…”