2013
DOI: 10.1002/2013jd020527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of daily photosynthetically active radiation and its trends over China

Abstract: [1] Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) is widely required in ecological studies, but it is not routinely measured at China Meteorological Administration (CMA) stations. In this study, a PAR model is utilized to estimate daily PAR from routine meteorological parameters (air temperature, air pressure, relative humidity, and sunshine duration) at CMA stations. The estimate is evaluated against measurements at 10 Chinese Ecosystem Research Network (CERN) stations. The model can produce PAR with mean bias er… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(106 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7. This distribution is similar to the distributions of photosynthetically active radiation and surface solar radiation reconstructed by Tang et al (2013aTang et al ( , 2013b.…”
Section: Sample Description Of the Observed Uv Radiation Valuessupporting
confidence: 78%
“…7. This distribution is similar to the distributions of photosynthetically active radiation and surface solar radiation reconstructed by Tang et al (2013aTang et al ( , 2013b.…”
Section: Sample Description Of the Observed Uv Radiation Valuessupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This may indicate that there may be some physical connection between cloud transmittance and relative sunshine duration. The model of Qin et al () was also applied to reconstruct a data set of daily PAR over China by Tang, Qin, et al (), and the accuracy of the data set is comparable to that of a local‐calibrated model. In a word, thus, we may expect that the cloud transmittance calibrated in the United States could work well in China to construct a data set of daily direct radiation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21,12,35]). PAR has to be estimated through either empirical/semiphysical methods or remote sensing techniques (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though Zhu et al [50] analyzed the interannual variations of PAR in recent 50 years, but their empirical model based on sunshine duration and 4-year observations has not been tested (the model accuracy was unknown); the possible reasons for the spatiotemporal variability has also not been analyzed. Tang et al [35] reconstructed daily PAR over China using a semiphysical method based on meteorological data, their model results were compared with measurements at 10 stations across the whole country, which should be further tested; they also have not analyzed the longterm variations of PAR in China in detail. Our earlier study Wang et al [42] proposed an efficient all-sky model for estimating PAR under various sky conditions and reconstructed the historical values in Wuhan, central China, but there is no more information about how PAR evolved during the past 52 years (1961-2012) for the whole country (at national scale) in China, especially the hourly/daily cumulative values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%