2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00340-016-6368-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of exciton wave functions of coupled quantum emitters including spin with ultrafast spectroscopy using localized nanooptical fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other (positive) contributions between the first and second rung are overlapping with resonances 1 and 2, which slightly affect their line shape. The negative peaks 3 and 4 can be a result that only the TLS polarization is included, missing the photon part of the polariton and probably a result caused by expansion coefficients of the polariton together with a local detection only on the TLS [53][54][55][56], or an excitation transfer process (see Ref. 39 for details).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other (positive) contributions between the first and second rung are overlapping with resonances 1 and 2, which slightly affect their line shape. The negative peaks 3 and 4 can be a result that only the TLS polarization is included, missing the photon part of the polariton and probably a result caused by expansion coefficients of the polariton together with a local detection only on the TLS [53][54][55][56], or an excitation transfer process (see Ref. 39 for details).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative features are of course puzzling, but can be a result, that the system is in the local basis and thus expansion coefficients such as c 1 e or c 12 f etc, and their phase enter the signal. While our method does not allow to access the bath-the photon part-we can show, that if we detect only one quantum emitter [53][54][55][56], formally dark state can give negative contributions in the spectrum (cf. Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%