2013
DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-7-73
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of large-scale regulatory networks based on perturbation graphs and transitive reduction: improved methods and their evaluation

Abstract: BackgroundThe data-driven inference of intracellular networks is one of the key challenges of computational and systems biology. As suggested by recent works, a simple yet effective approach for reconstructing regulatory networks comprises the following two steps. First, the observed effects induced by directed perturbations are collected in a signed and directed perturbation graph (PG). In a second step, Transitive Reduction (TR) is used to identify and eliminate those edges in the PG that can be explained by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for genome-wide and other large-scale networks the regression-based method LASSO (GENLAB, van Someren et al, 2006[ 161 ]) seems to be best situated if it is well configured and the experimental data and prior knowledge are of sufficient quantity and quality (Marbach et al, 2012[ 99 ]). Boolean and static network modeling should be preferred if the data are mainly steady state gene expression data from KO experiments or for modeling of signaling pathways, respectively (Eduati et al, 2010[ 33 ]; Klamt et al, 2010[ 78 ]; Flassig et al, 2013[ 41 ]; Samaga and Klamt, 2013[ 142 ]; Pinna et al, 2013[ 129 ]; Ryll et al, 2014[ 141 ]; Nakajima and Akutsu, 2014[ 121 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for genome-wide and other large-scale networks the regression-based method LASSO (GENLAB, van Someren et al, 2006[ 161 ]) seems to be best situated if it is well configured and the experimental data and prior knowledge are of sufficient quantity and quality (Marbach et al, 2012[ 99 ]). Boolean and static network modeling should be preferred if the data are mainly steady state gene expression data from KO experiments or for modeling of signaling pathways, respectively (Eduati et al, 2010[ 33 ]; Klamt et al, 2010[ 78 ]; Flassig et al, 2013[ 41 ]; Samaga and Klamt, 2013[ 142 ]; Pinna et al, 2013[ 129 ]; Ryll et al, 2014[ 141 ]; Nakajima and Akutsu, 2014[ 121 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This simple procedure may not work when G U contains a negative cycle (a directed cycle with an odd number of negative edges), since the cumulative sign of such a cycle alternates depending on how many times one traverses through it. A recent study comparing different ways to obtain the transitive reduction of a signed GRN digraph (with and without cycles) recommended a simple procedure called Local Transitive Reduction (LTR) [ 14 ]. In the following, we have adapted LTR to generate the lower bound signed digraph G L for TRaCE+.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, a positive edge reflects an activation, while a negative edge describes a repression. Several notable network inference algorithms such as TRANSitive reduction for WEighted Signed Digraphs (TRANSWESD) [ 13 ] and Local Transitive Reduction (LTR) [ 14 ] previously considered the inference of GRN digraph with signed (and weighted) edges. However, these algorithms were not designed for inferring an ensemble of GRN structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the questionnaire data can aid research that aims to infer causal relations between variables. Since the data contain both observational and experimental data, algorithms like the downward ranking of feed-forward loops (DR-FFL; [4]), the invariant causal prediction (ICP; [5]), or newly created algorithms can be used to investigate to what extent questionnaire items causally influence each other. Second, this data can be used to study the malleability of a person's attitude towards meat consumption, a "hot topic" [2].…”
Section: Reuse Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%