“…Note the short time of agreement between both reconstructions. References with indication of chronology quality (dpm: 14 C dates per millennium, model applied when corresponds; other methods; Blaauw et al, 2018): 1 Fletcher and Moreno, 2012 (4, Oxcal; 210 Pb); 2 Coviaga et al, 2017 (2, Oxcal; 137 Cs); 3 Fagel et al, 2008 (varve/ 137 Cs/ 210 Pb); 4 Bertrand et al, 2005 (varve/ 137 Cs/ 210 Pb/ Tephra); 5 Ariztegui et al, 2007 (4; varve/ 137 Cs); 6 Serra et al, 2016 ( 210 Pb/Tephra); 7 Lamy et al, 2001 (1, linear interpolation); 8 Villalba, 1994 (dendrochronology); 9 Lara and Villalba, 1993 (dendrochronology); 10 Williams et al, 2016 ( 137 Cs/ 210 Pb/Tephra); 11 Williams et al, 2019 ( 137 Cs/ 210 Pb/Tephra); 12 Masiokas et al, 2010 (dendrogeomorphic); 13 # This study (1.3, Oxcal; 137 Cs/Tephra); 14 Bertrand et al, 2014 (5, Clam); 15 Stine, 1993 (dead trees); 16 Ohlendorf et al, 2014 (2, mixed regression); 17 Fey et al, 2009 (4, linear interpolation); 18 Moreno et al, 2009 (2, cubic spline); 19 Moy et al, 2008 (3, 3 rd -order polynomial); 20 Haberzettl et al, 2005 (2, polynomial); 21 Mayr et al, 2005 (3, linear interpolation); 22 Schimpf et al, 2011 (Th/U ages); 23 van Bellen et al, 2016 (7–9, Bacon); 25 Waldmann et al, 2010 (0.2; Tephra); 25 Mauquoy et al, 2004 (9.3); 26 Ponce et al, 2011 (0.5, 2 rd -order polynomial).
…”