2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2022.101374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of the mid-Devonian HP-HT metamorphic event in the Bohemian Massif (European Variscan belt)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, if in the same Variscan internal zone, metabasalts have protolith ages on the one hand at 500 Ma and on the other hand at 470-450 Ma this means that they come from two different oceanic crusts, the youngest being the Rheic Ocean and the oldest the so-called Mirovoi or Ran Ocean, depending on the authors. It is significant to note that similar results were obtained in other segments of the northeastern Variscan belt with similar conclusions (Soejono et al, 2010;Collett et al, 2020Collett et al, , 2022.…”
Section: B-magmatic Protolith Ages and Geodynamic Consequencessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Consequently, if in the same Variscan internal zone, metabasalts have protolith ages on the one hand at 500 Ma and on the other hand at 470-450 Ma this means that they come from two different oceanic crusts, the youngest being the Rheic Ocean and the oldest the so-called Mirovoi or Ran Ocean, depending on the authors. It is significant to note that similar results were obtained in other segments of the northeastern Variscan belt with similar conclusions (Soejono et al, 2010;Collett et al, 2020Collett et al, , 2022.…”
Section: B-magmatic Protolith Ages and Geodynamic Consequencessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This allows us to propose a new model for the development of the Cambro-Ordovician rocks cropping out in the eastern part of the Fore-Sudetic Block from the early Palaeozoic to the Carboniferous. The model is generally consistent with those proposed for other Late Neoproterozoic and Cambro-Ordovician sequences exposed in the Bohemian Massif (Jastrzębski et al 2017; Hajná et al 2018; Collett et al 2020; Soejono et al 2020; Collett et al 2022; Soejono et al 2022). Our data combined with already published results shed new light on the development of the passive Gondwana margin and the nature of the tectonic suture separating the Central and East Sudetes.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Some authors discussed the presence of the Rheic suture between the Central and East Sudetes (e.g. Mazur et al 2012; Jastrzębski et al 2013; Jastrzębski et al 2015; Oberc-Dziedzic et al 2018; Jastrzębski et al 2020; Śliwiński et al 2022), while others questioned its existence in this fragment of the Variscan belt of Europe (Soejono et al 2010; Collett et al 2021, 2022). Unfortunately, this fragment of the Variscan orogen is partly located on the Fore-Sudetic Block, where the metamorphic basement is mostly covered by Cenozoic sediments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different architecture of the eastern part of the European Variscan belt is also supported by geophysical identification of two parallel and south‐dipping belts associated with dense bodies separating the Saxothuringian basement from the Teplá‐Barrandian Zone upper plate and the Central Armorican Domain from the French Massif Central (Schulmann et al., 2022; Figure 1). The structurally higher belt of reflectors is interpreted as a remnant of the Mid‐Variscan Ocean closed during Upper Devonian (Collett et al., 2022), while the structurally deeper reflectors are located above the high‐velocity and high‐density zone representing a deeply subducted continental margin of the Saxothruringian block beneath the Mid‐Variscan Allochthon during early Carboniferous (Konopásek et al., 2019). This deep continental subduction is associated with the development of the Saxothuringian orogenic wedge described here and is likely responsible for sub‐lithospheric relamination and early Carboniferous thickening of the Mid‐Variscan Allochthon followed by the formation of HP granulite diapirs described in the Moldanubian unit (Maierová et al., 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earliest stages of the Saxothuringian wedge indicate the development of an accretionary wedge during oceanic subduction. Its relics are preserved in the Mariánské Lázně Complex and Münchberg Klippe (Collett et al, 2018(Collett et al, , 2022Deiller et al, 2021;Scherer et al, 2000) located in the hanging wall of the later orogenic wedge (Münchberg Crystalline Complex in Figures 2a and 14c). These two complexes contain oceanic crust derived fragments that had been subducted to peak pressures at ∼390 Ma and later incorporated into the accretionary wedge and exhumed below the blocking temperatures of the argon system by ∼375 Ma (Collett et al, 2018;Dallmeyer & Urban, 1998).…”
Section: Assembly Of the Saxothuringian Orogenic Wedgementioning
confidence: 99%