2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2009.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of volumetric ultrasound panorama based on improved 3D SIFT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
52
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found the success rate to vary between 85% and 97%, with a higher success rate (.95%) in those cases when we either considered a higher number of slice pairs or limited the search range in the axial direction. The results are comparable with those of Ni et al [11], who demonstrated 83% success for non-clinical data and 85% for clinical data. These results were only based on one clinical data set, rather than a range of patients [11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We found the success rate to vary between 85% and 97%, with a higher success rate (.95%) in those cases when we either considered a higher number of slice pairs or limited the search range in the axial direction. The results are comparable with those of Ni et al [11], who demonstrated 83% success for non-clinical data and 85% for clinical data. These results were only based on one clinical data set, rather than a range of patients [11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The results are comparable with those of Ni et al [11], who demonstrated 83% success for non-clinical data and 85% for clinical data. These results were only based on one clinical data set, rather than a range of patients [11]. Our results, from 47 clinical data sets, are therefore more reflective of the clinical scenario when a registration algorithm would be required to work on a range of patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The extension of the SIFT approach to three dimensional data has been attempted by several researchers [2,6,7,16,17,19]. Scovanner et al [19] created a 3D SIFT descriptor for application to action recognition in video volumes and additionally work has been encountered in the application of 3D SIFT to medical registration [2,6,17] or panoramic medical image stitching [7,16]. The use of SIFT for 2D object recognition relies on objects having textures internal to their boundary such that these regions can be reliably described from one image to another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ni improved the SIFT (scale-invariant feature transform) algorithm to register ultrasound volumes acquired globally from dedicated ultrasound probes [7]. Bulatov assumed that camera matrices and a sparse set of 3D points are available and computed dense 3D point clouds from a sequential set of images [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%