Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Reconstructive breast surgery, including the use of silicone endoprostheses after radical mastectomy, is an integral part of the comprehensive treatment of breast cancer patients. One of the serious long‑term complications of reconstructive surgery is capsular contracture (CC). Purpose of the study. To analyze the literature data on the etiopathogenesis of periprosthetic capsule (PC) defects and the possibilities of reducing the risk of CC after breast reconstructive surgery. Materials and methods. The literature was searched using PubMed, eLibrary, Cyberleninka databases. The following keywords were used: "breast reconstruction", "capsular contracture", "radiation therapy", "polyurethane", "breast implant", "mesh implant". Original studies, meta‑analyses, randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews were used. Results. The exact etiology of the development of CC has not yet been established. The main pathogenetic mechanism of CC development is chronic inflammation followed by the formation of capsular fibrosis. Radiation therapy significantly increases the risk of developing CC due to the development of fibrotic changes not only in the PC, but also the occurrence of fibrosis of the pectoralis major muscle. The frequency of CC is higher when using adjuvant radiation therapy, compared with neoadjuvant or no radiation therapy, as well as with dual‑plane reconstruction compared with pre‑pectoral placement of the endoprosthesis. The use of a polyurethane endoprosthesis in simultaneous pre‑pectoral breast reconstruction significantly reduces the risk of developing CC in the case of adjuvant radiation therapy, in comparison with textured endoprostheses. One of the ways to reduce the risk of developing CC in breast cancer can be considered the installation of mesh implants, which contributes to the augmentation of the integumentary tissues and improves the stability of the breast endoprosthesis in conditions of tissue deficiency. Conclusion. Simultaneous pre‑pectoral breast reconstruction based on polyurethane endoprosthesis and mesh implants can be considered as a promising technique for reducing the risk of developing CC. There is a positive trend towards reducing the risk of developing CC against the background of adjuvant radiation therapy. Further research is needed related to the reduction of the risk of developing CC.
Reconstructive breast surgery, including the use of silicone endoprostheses after radical mastectomy, is an integral part of the comprehensive treatment of breast cancer patients. One of the serious long‑term complications of reconstructive surgery is capsular contracture (CC). Purpose of the study. To analyze the literature data on the etiopathogenesis of periprosthetic capsule (PC) defects and the possibilities of reducing the risk of CC after breast reconstructive surgery. Materials and methods. The literature was searched using PubMed, eLibrary, Cyberleninka databases. The following keywords were used: "breast reconstruction", "capsular contracture", "radiation therapy", "polyurethane", "breast implant", "mesh implant". Original studies, meta‑analyses, randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews were used. Results. The exact etiology of the development of CC has not yet been established. The main pathogenetic mechanism of CC development is chronic inflammation followed by the formation of capsular fibrosis. Radiation therapy significantly increases the risk of developing CC due to the development of fibrotic changes not only in the PC, but also the occurrence of fibrosis of the pectoralis major muscle. The frequency of CC is higher when using adjuvant radiation therapy, compared with neoadjuvant or no radiation therapy, as well as with dual‑plane reconstruction compared with pre‑pectoral placement of the endoprosthesis. The use of a polyurethane endoprosthesis in simultaneous pre‑pectoral breast reconstruction significantly reduces the risk of developing CC in the case of adjuvant radiation therapy, in comparison with textured endoprostheses. One of the ways to reduce the risk of developing CC in breast cancer can be considered the installation of mesh implants, which contributes to the augmentation of the integumentary tissues and improves the stability of the breast endoprosthesis in conditions of tissue deficiency. Conclusion. Simultaneous pre‑pectoral breast reconstruction based on polyurethane endoprosthesis and mesh implants can be considered as a promising technique for reducing the risk of developing CC. There is a positive trend towards reducing the risk of developing CC against the background of adjuvant radiation therapy. Further research is needed related to the reduction of the risk of developing CC.
Introduction. Indications for radiation therapy after mastectomies with/without reconstruction at T12N01M0 remain unclear; treatment standards contain references to the possible administration of radiation therapy for factors that increase breast cancer recurrence. Materials and methods. A retrospective singlecenter, nonrandomized study enrolled 984 breast cancer patients treated at P.A. Gertsen Moscow Cancer Research Institute from 2014 to 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a radiotherapy group and a nonradiotherapy group. Results and discussion. The paper presents an analysis of patients’ age, the histological structure of the tumor, immunohistochemical characteristics, tumor grade, multicentricity, presence of lymphovascular invasion, tumor cells, the state of R1 and R0 margins, and the tumor stage at risk of recurrence. Overall survival in the recurrence group accounted for 95.1%, in the nonrecurrence group – 98.4%. In the radiotherapy group (group I), the overall survival comprised 98.4%; metastases were diagnosed in 4.9% of cases. In thenonradiotherapy group (group II), the overall survival amounted to 98.2%; metastases were revealed in 5.9% of cases. Conclusion. Univariate analysis in the study groups showed that radiation therapy reduced the risk of relapse by 3.5%. In case of positive R1 margin, radiotherapy is recommended, which was confirmed in our study, the difference accounted for 14.5%, and in the presence of R1, radiotherapy is claimed to be necessary in the postoperative period. When analyzing the stage of breast cancer and the risk of recurrence, the statistical difference was revealed only at stage IIA (T1N1M0); radiation therapy reduced the risk of breast cancer recurrence. The statistical difference in groups I and II was detected at Grade 2 tumor, Ki67 level less than 50%, presence of tumor embolism and age of patients under 40 years. Radiation therapy after subcutaneous/skinsparing mastectomy reduces the recurrence risk by 3.2%; however, the overall survival in group I and group II accounted for 98.4 and 98.2%, respectively; the difference is not statistically significant. In our study, the criteria for prescribing radiation therapy in the postoperative period include: young age of the patients, R1 resection margin, luminal/nonluminal HER2 positive type, cN1, presence of tumor embolism.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.