“…Similar to determining the right programing for a group, adding follow-up activities should depend on the needs of the participants and the logistical constraints of the CC staff (e.g., time, availability, accessible resources, etc.). An additional strategy could be training a member of the group to be a facilitator for the group throughout the semester, which could help strengthen the learning outcomes (Stan, 2009). However, this study is not without limitations.…”
Section: Significance For Challenge Course Facilitatorsmentioning
The purpose of this study was to examine the retention of challenge course outcomes with the addition of intentional follow-up activities. The Challenge Course Experience Questionnaire (CCEQ) was administered to 101 participants in an introductory college course. The sample was divided into two separate groups: experimental group (EG; n = 67) and control group (CG; n = 34). Both groups completed a classroom-based challenge course program. Participants in the EG also included guided reflection-based activities throughout the semester and a facilitator-led activity. The CG only participated in the initial challenge course program. All participants significantly increased in CCEQ variables immediately following the program. However, the three-month follow-up revealed that the majority of variables decreased to preprogram levels for both groups. However, the variables had larger decreases in the CG. These findings have implications for challenge course programming in terms of long-term outcome retention. Suggestions for facilitators and future research are provided.
“…Similar to determining the right programing for a group, adding follow-up activities should depend on the needs of the participants and the logistical constraints of the CC staff (e.g., time, availability, accessible resources, etc.). An additional strategy could be training a member of the group to be a facilitator for the group throughout the semester, which could help strengthen the learning outcomes (Stan, 2009). However, this study is not without limitations.…”
Section: Significance For Challenge Course Facilitatorsmentioning
The purpose of this study was to examine the retention of challenge course outcomes with the addition of intentional follow-up activities. The Challenge Course Experience Questionnaire (CCEQ) was administered to 101 participants in an introductory college course. The sample was divided into two separate groups: experimental group (EG; n = 67) and control group (CG; n = 34). Both groups completed a classroom-based challenge course program. Participants in the EG also included guided reflection-based activities throughout the semester and a facilitator-led activity. The CG only participated in the initial challenge course program. All participants significantly increased in CCEQ variables immediately following the program. However, the three-month follow-up revealed that the majority of variables decreased to preprogram levels for both groups. However, the variables had larger decreases in the CG. These findings have implications for challenge course programming in terms of long-term outcome retention. Suggestions for facilitators and future research are provided.
“…The conclusion the local authority stakeholder drew from this episode was that supporting teachers by taking time to work collaboratively with them would often be necessary in developing pedagogical expertise and in providing teachers with the confidence to continue teaching outdoors. Stan (2009) researched the detail of group interaction in outdoor learning and contrasted the relative merits of different approaches to facilitation. A detached approach was criticised for its lack of focus on outcomes and support and empathy with learners, while a contrasting controlling approach was also considered ineffective due to its lack of flexibility and an overemphasis on achieving outcomes.…”
Section: Professionalism (Learning In Context /Changing Context)mentioning
His main interests are in values and experiential learning across a range of different contexts including expeditions, formal education and curriculum, sail training and mountaineering. He is Deputy Director of Post Graduate Studies in the School and responsible for Masters level research methods courses.
“…This might include considerations such as whether it is acceptable to build in a place where the circle or cairn is likely to remain permanent, or whether it is better to build on a beach or part of the river where incoming tides and rising water levels ensure the 'work' only exists for a short time. This example highlights the high level of teacher expertise required in defining contingent and particular learning tasks, being able to predict pupils' responses and in being able to direct and redirect pupils' attention towards sequences of reasoning (Zagzebski, 1996) which help pupils to experience the outdoors and develop positive relationships with others at one and the same time (Stan, 2009;Thomas, 2008).…”
Section: The Implications Of Deweyan and Neo-aristotelian Thinking Fomentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.