2015
DOI: 10.22621/cfn.v129i2.1699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Record long-distance movement of a Deer Mouse, <em>Peromyscus maniculatus</em>, in a New England montane boreal forest

Abstract: Wood, Connor M., and Shawn T. McKinney. 2015. Record long-distance movement of a Deer Mouse, Peromyscus maniculatus, in a New England montane boreal forest. Canadian Field-Naturalist 129(2): 181-182.We report a single-season, non-homing movement of 4287 ± 10 m by an adult male Deer Mouse, Peromyscus maniculatus, in western Maine, United States, in summer 2014. The movement was achieved in two stages: 927 ± 3 m in four days and an additional 3360 ± 10 m in 44 days. This is approximately 40% greater than the pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these papers, our dispersals (> 115 m) can be classified as LDDs and the frequency of LDD by deer mice in APP (4.2%) was remarkably similar to these frequencies reported in the literature. The dispersal distances in our study exceeded previous reports for P. maniculatus, with 13% (n = 20) of observed dispersals exceeding the previous reported maximum long-distance movement (4287 ± 10 m, in Wood and McKinney 2015). Our observed maximum dispersal distance of 11.3 km represents a 164% increase on that previous maximum.…”
Section: Frequency and Distance Of Dispersalsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on these papers, our dispersals (> 115 m) can be classified as LDDs and the frequency of LDD by deer mice in APP (4.2%) was remarkably similar to these frequencies reported in the literature. The dispersal distances in our study exceeded previous reports for P. maniculatus, with 13% (n = 20) of observed dispersals exceeding the previous reported maximum long-distance movement (4287 ± 10 m, in Wood and McKinney 2015). Our observed maximum dispersal distance of 11.3 km represents a 164% increase on that previous maximum.…”
Section: Frequency and Distance Of Dispersalsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…are vectors (Meerburg et al 2009;Gaitan and Millien 2016). These distribution tails are notoriously difficult to quantify (Koenig et al 1996), and LDD in deer mice is generally reported anecdotally or with little detail (Jung et al 2005;Wood and McKinney 2015).…”
Section: Frequency and Distance Of Dispersalmentioning
confidence: 99%