2015
DOI: 10.3989/egeol.41828.342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Record of <em>Carcharocles megalodon</em> in the Eastern Guadalquivir Basin (Upper Miocene, South Spain)

Abstract: Tortonian diatomites of the San Felix Quarry (Porcuna), in the Eastern Guadalquivir Basin, have given isolated marine vertebrate remains that include a large shark tooth (123.96 mm from apex to the baseline of the root). The large size of the crown height (92.2 mm), the triangular shape, the broad serrated crown, the convex lingual face and flat labial face, and the robust, thick angled root determine that this specimen corresponds to Carcharocles megalodon. The symmetry with low slant shows it to be an upper … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, addressing these issues is beyond the scope of this paper primarily because our study rests on multiple assumptions, such as growth bands in IRSNB P 9893 representing annual cycles and the unconventional application of VBGF to a single individual (see Materials and Methods). In addition, the 9.21-m-TL estimate for IRSNB P 9893 (Gottfried et al 1996) and tooth-based TL estimates (Gottfried et al 1996;Shimada 2019) used in this study assume that the modern white shark is the most reasonable analogue of O. megalodon among modern sharks (Randall 1973;Gottfried et al 1996;Reolid and Molina 2015;Razak and Kocsis 2018;Shimada 2019). Nonetheless, our study is the first of its kind for the iconic species, taking the science of O. megalodon one step further.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, addressing these issues is beyond the scope of this paper primarily because our study rests on multiple assumptions, such as growth bands in IRSNB P 9893 representing annual cycles and the unconventional application of VBGF to a single individual (see Materials and Methods). In addition, the 9.21-m-TL estimate for IRSNB P 9893 (Gottfried et al 1996) and tooth-based TL estimates (Gottfried et al 1996;Shimada 2019) used in this study assume that the modern white shark is the most reasonable analogue of O. megalodon among modern sharks (Randall 1973;Gottfried et al 1996;Reolid and Molina 2015;Razak and Kocsis 2018;Shimada 2019). Nonetheless, our study is the first of its kind for the iconic species, taking the science of O. megalodon one step further.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Because teeth of C. carcharias are considered to be the best modern analogue to estimate the gigantic size of the extinct megatooth shark, Otodus megalodon (e.g. Gottfried et al 1996;Shimada 2003;Reolid and Molina 2015;D'Anastasio et al 2018), we added the TL and essential tooth measurements (CH of A1 and a2) from a 'midsized' (ca. 3.8 m TL) individual as well as from the largest (ca.…”
Section: Data From Extant Macrophagous Lamniformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carcharodon carcharias is the largest macrophagous shark alive today, achieving maximum body lengths of arguably 6 to 7 m (Gottfried et al, 1996;Castro, 2012;McClain et al, 2015). Otodus megalodon represents the largest macrophagous shark that ever lived, with contentious adult estimates ranging from 10 to more than 30 m (Dean, 1909;Randall, 1973;Bendix-Almgreen, 1983;Gottfried et al, 1996;Pimiento et al, 2010;Pimiento and Balk, 2015;Reolid and Molina, 2015;Trif et al, 2016;Grant et al, 2017;Razak and Kocsis, 2018;Shimada, 2002aShimada, , 2019Herraiz et al, 2020). This longstanding interest in body size of the world's largest marine macropredators has been shared by professional paleontologists and the public alike.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%