2017
DOI: 10.1504/ijmtm.2017.10002918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recorded music supply network reconfiguration: the dual effect of digital technology

Abstract: Current literature on the impact of technology innovation has mainly focused on manufacturing firms and networks and has considered technology impact as having an immediate effect on the supply network. This paper analyses how digital technology has impacted the recorded music supply network, a fast moving supply chain, arguing that it had a twofold effect. It was initially applied to the production process, displaying a competency enhancing effect but not changing substantially the industry structure and gove… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, from the late 1990s, digital technology has severely challenged that practice and their dominance. Although digital technology has been used in recording and production since the 1980s, it has only changed the music business when it started to be applied in distribution (Nakano and Fleury, 2017). Large scale digital music distribution was initially unauthorized, performed by file sharing in P2P networks, which threatened recording companies' revenues: there was no need to buy a physical format to enjoy a phonogram or to borrow one to make a home copy; one could simply download it, for free, from the Internet.…”
Section: Digital Music Business Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, from the late 1990s, digital technology has severely challenged that practice and their dominance. Although digital technology has been used in recording and production since the 1980s, it has only changed the music business when it started to be applied in distribution (Nakano and Fleury, 2017). Large scale digital music distribution was initially unauthorized, performed by file sharing in P2P networks, which threatened recording companies' revenues: there was no need to buy a physical format to enjoy a phonogram or to borrow one to make a home copy; one could simply download it, for free, from the Internet.…”
Section: Digital Music Business Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the content production side, it is comprised of big traditional companies (Majors) and small independent firms (Indies), independent artists, recording studios and specialized service providers. On the digital distribution side, it is now composed by content aggregators and digital outlets (Nakano and Fleury, 2017), with Apple Music and Spotify as the leading firms (Ipsos Connect, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%