“…It is considered that different RPI recording efficiency between these two components may be responsible for the climatic contamination, which is likely originated from their different acquisition efficiencies of natural remanent magnetization (NRM) and the normalizers usually used for RPI estimations, namely the anhysteretic remanent magnetization (ARM) and the isothermal remanent magnetization (IRM). Some previous studies using Pacific marine sediments proposed that RPI recording efficiency of the magnetofossil component is lower than that of the detrital component, and that increasing proportion of the magnetofossil component causes underestimation of RPI (Gai et al., 2021; Inoue et al., 2021; Li et al., 2022). This explains frequently reported anti‐correlation between RPI and the ratio of ARM susceptibility to saturation IRM ( k ARM /SIRM) (Hofmann & Fabian, 2009; Inoue et al., 2021; Li et al., 2022; Sakuramoto et al., 2017; Yamazaki et al., 2013), as k ARM /SIRM is a proxy for the proportion of the magnetofossil to detrital components (Egli, 2004; Yamazaki, 2008; Zhang et al., 2022) as well as magnetic grain size (Banerjee et al., 1981; King et al., 1982).…”