The essays in this thematic issue offer exciting new insights into the experience of internment and include some innovative methodological approaches to this aspect of "painful heritage." The material in these papers also throws light on some issues that are not the direct focus of these studies, but relate to experiences of both those involved with internment at the time, of survivors and descendants, and of contemporary researchers. Using the evidence and arguments presented here from Amache, Monticello, and Kooskia, and combining this with experiences from elsewhere, not only in North America, but also Europe and the Pacific, it is possible to discern some significant patterns that frame archaeological research on these types of sites. The reflections here can be articulated under a series of four headings: coping strategies during internment; remembering, forgetting, and coping in peacetime; archaeology, oral history, and remembering ; and archaeology and embodying the internment experience. Larger issues come out of the particular, when the biographies of places, families, and individuals relating to internment are examined. This is how I have explored internments on the Isle of Man in both World Wars (Mytum 2011, 2012, 2013b), as the scholars here are examining distinctive forms of imprisonment during World War II in the United States in their chosen locations for study. Taking a comparative