2002
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2002.1017761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recording technologies for terabit per square inch systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
94
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The physical spacing between the magnetic sensors and the disk is down to almost 10 nm in recent systems, and it will be necessary to be within 5-7 nm for areal densities in the Tbin -2 range. (Wood et al,2002) The read/write magnetic heads are mounted in the slider and travel across the data zone during the reading and writing operations. Fig.…”
Section: Hard Disk Drive Systems (Hdds)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical spacing between the magnetic sensors and the disk is down to almost 10 nm in recent systems, and it will be necessary to be within 5-7 nm for areal densities in the Tbin -2 range. (Wood et al,2002) The read/write magnetic heads are mounted in the slider and travel across the data zone during the reading and writing operations. Fig.…”
Section: Hard Disk Drive Systems (Hdds)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that there are two sources of the electronics noise: 10 Ohm GMR sensor and 0.2 nV/sqrt(Hz) preamp noise over a 500 MIHz CTF bandwidth at 1 Gigabit/sec data rate. It is believed that the most advanced encoding software channels (e.g., turbo) could reduce the bit error rate (BER) to 10-9 even for a 10 dB SNR recording system [25]. Even with such advanced encoding, only four to five layers could be distinguished in such a trivial implementation of 3-D recording.…”
Section: Data Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Densities in excess of 100 Gb/in have been demonstrated and it is widely projected that conventional technology will ultimately achieve 1 Tb/in . It is foreseeable that at such areal densities, a track density of 0.5 million tracks/inch will be required, with each recorded bit being roughly 13 50 nm [1]. Under such conditions, the tracking accuracy required is approximately 1.5 nm root mean square (RMS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%