2021
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Records of ctenophores from South Africa

Abstract: Although ctenophores can be conspicuous components of the plankton in coastal marine ecosystems, only six species have been formally described from around South Africa. Using photographs from local community scientists, we add a further three species (Cestum veneris, Beroe forskalii?, Ocyropsis maculata?) and six morphospecies to the regional fauna. These additions suggest that South Africa has a ctenophore fauna that is amongst the most diverse, globally; an observation in agreement with information from othe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, this genus only comprises two species: Lyrocteis flavopallidus Robilliard & Dayton, 1972 and Lyrocteis imperatoris Komai, 1941, the first originally described from the Antarctic, the latter described and observed multiple times in the Pacific Ocean. Recently, an unknown species of Lyrocteis that resembles the present observations from Seychelles was recorded in canyons off northern KwaZulu Natal, in the Western Indian Ocean ( Gibbons et al 2021 ). However, it was not possible to identify these ctenophores to species level from underwater images alone without further microscopic examination (Fig.…”
Section: Checklistssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Currently, this genus only comprises two species: Lyrocteis flavopallidus Robilliard & Dayton, 1972 and Lyrocteis imperatoris Komai, 1941, the first originally described from the Antarctic, the latter described and observed multiple times in the Pacific Ocean. Recently, an unknown species of Lyrocteis that resembles the present observations from Seychelles was recorded in canyons off northern KwaZulu Natal, in the Western Indian Ocean ( Gibbons et al 2021 ). However, it was not possible to identify these ctenophores to species level from underwater images alone without further microscopic examination (Fig.…”
Section: Checklistssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…While we can speculate as to its origin, it is clear that Lilyopsis is not resident in False Bay because it has only been observed once during the many years that one of us (CF) has been snorkeling daily at the site in False Bay. Neither has it been observed by another frequent community scientist, Peter Southward (see Gibbons et al 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Traditionally, the reporting of new species in areas outside known distributional ranges has been the purview of professional scientists, but this is rapidly changing as we harness the interest, enthusiasm and effort of community scientists (e.g. Gibbons et al 2021). Here, we report on a genus of siphonophore not previously recorded from the South Atlantic from an image taken by one such community scientist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most oceanic ctenophores are from the orders Lobata (or lobate ctenophores) or Cydippida (Gibbons et al 2021; Schiariti et al 2021). Lobate ctenophores have large oral lobes, reduced tentillae, and use fused cilia (or ctenes) arranged along four auricles to generate a feeding current.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%