2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-05465-5_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recoverable Robustness in Shunting and Timetabling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The di↵erent models proposed to increase the robustness of public transport networks and timetables to relatively small delays (Cicerone et al, 2009;Fischetti and Monaci, 2009;Liebchen et al, 2010) are aimed at the planning phase. Link closures however, are not, and cannot, be taken into account in this planning of standard operations, as they occur infrequently and require significant alterations from normal operations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The di↵erent models proposed to increase the robustness of public transport networks and timetables to relatively small delays (Cicerone et al, 2009;Fischetti and Monaci, 2009;Liebchen et al, 2010) are aimed at the planning phase. Link closures however, are not, and cannot, be taken into account in this planning of standard operations, as they occur infrequently and require significant alterations from normal operations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They use probabilities for the occurrence of different disruptions. Cicerone et al (2009) study recoverable robust approaches for several railway shunting and timetabling problems. They analyse some recovery algorithms and provide lower and upper bounds to the solution.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different models proposed to increase the robustness of public transport networks and timetables to relatively small delays (Cicerone et al 2009, Fischetti and Monaci 2009, Liebchen et al 2010) are aimed at the planning phase. Link closures however, are not, and cannot, be taken into account in this planning of standard operations, as they occur infrequently and require significant alterations from normal operations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%