2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3322049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovering Social Networks from Panel Data: Identification, Simulations and an Application

Abstract: It is almost self-evident that social interactions can determine economic behavior and outcomes. Yet, information on social ties does not exist in most publicly available and widely used datasets. We present methods to recover information on the entire structure of social networks from observational panel data that contains no information on social ties between individuals. In the context of a canonical social interactions model, we provide sufficient conditions under which the social interactions matrix, endo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More generally, a promising idea emerging from the recent literature is that peer effects can be identified even with very imperfect knowledge of the actual network of interactions, see in particular Theorems 6 and 7 in Blume et al (2015). In a panel context, peer effects can even be identified with no knowledge of the network under the assumption that the network does not change over time, see Manresa (2016), de Paula, Rasul, andSouza (2018), Rose (2016). In that case, the network of interactions itself can potentially be identified and be recovered from the data.…”
Section: Imperfect Knowledge Of the Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, a promising idea emerging from the recent literature is that peer effects can be identified even with very imperfect knowledge of the actual network of interactions, see in particular Theorems 6 and 7 in Blume et al (2015). In a panel context, peer effects can even be identified with no knowledge of the network under the assumption that the network does not change over time, see Manresa (2016), de Paula, Rasul, andSouza (2018), Rose (2016). In that case, the network of interactions itself can potentially be identified and be recovered from the data.…”
Section: Imperfect Knowledge Of the Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The establishment of a link g i,j increases the effectiveness of i and of any other legislator who has a direct or indirect link to i: so if j does not have a direct or an indirect link that points to i, then j is indifferent; if j has a direct or indirect link to i, then j strictly prefers that i establishes a link with him/her. 22 It follows that legislator i chooses his links solving:…”
Section: The Formation Of the Network At T =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collecting data and mapping out criminal networks is clearly more problematic, costly, and time consuming than mapping out (for example) a network of co-authorships among economists. 14 While most authors are trying to make their work as visible 14 See de Paula et al (2019) who provide results on the identification of social networks from observational panel data that contains no information on social ties between agents. See, also, Breza et al (2019) who propose an inexpensive and feasible strategy for network elicitation using Aggregated Relational Data (ARD) -responses to questions of the form "how many of your links have trait k?"…”
Section: Challenges Facing the Economic Model Of Network And Crimementioning
confidence: 99%