1987
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/38.4.691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery after Chilling: An Assessment of Chill-Tolerance inPhaseolusspp.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chilling significantly inhibited recovery of growth in both types of cultures (perlite or hydroponic) (Table 1), We can establish that the NAF component IS responsible for most of the negative effect of chilling on plant growth, whereas the rest of the growth related components (LAR and therefore SLA and LWR) do not change. According to Potvin (1986), as NAB represents net carbon uptake, the decrease should be related either to the reduction in photosynthesis or to an increase in respiration, Predrought treatment significantly reduced the negative effects of chilling on plant recovery, in both perlite and hydroponic conditions, as .NAR reached control values only in droughted plants (Table 1), Similar results were reported by Potvin (1986) and Wolfe (1991) in maize, Bruggemann et al (1992) have also found that drought-hardened plants of tomato grew faster than non-droughted plants during the recovery period, Necrotic leaf area is a good index for chilling injury and chilling sensitivity, Capell & DorfHing (1993) found a good correlation in maize plants between chilling sensitivity, necrotic leaf area, percentage of survival and membrane injury, measured as electrolytic leakage, Guye, Vigh & Wilson (1987) also related high percentage of leaf necrosis to low growth recovery. We observ'ed that pre-drought treatment significantly reduced the percentage of necrotic leaf area in both types of culture, which also correlates with the growth recovery showed above (Table 1), in agreement with the previous literature.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Chilling significantly inhibited recovery of growth in both types of cultures (perlite or hydroponic) (Table 1), We can establish that the NAF component IS responsible for most of the negative effect of chilling on plant growth, whereas the rest of the growth related components (LAR and therefore SLA and LWR) do not change. According to Potvin (1986), as NAB represents net carbon uptake, the decrease should be related either to the reduction in photosynthesis or to an increase in respiration, Predrought treatment significantly reduced the negative effects of chilling on plant recovery, in both perlite and hydroponic conditions, as .NAR reached control values only in droughted plants (Table 1), Similar results were reported by Potvin (1986) and Wolfe (1991) in maize, Bruggemann et al (1992) have also found that drought-hardened plants of tomato grew faster than non-droughted plants during the recovery period, Necrotic leaf area is a good index for chilling injury and chilling sensitivity, Capell & DorfHing (1993) found a good correlation in maize plants between chilling sensitivity, necrotic leaf area, percentage of survival and membrane injury, measured as electrolytic leakage, Guye, Vigh & Wilson (1987) also related high percentage of leaf necrosis to low growth recovery. We observ'ed that pre-drought treatment significantly reduced the percentage of necrotic leaf area in both types of culture, which also correlates with the growth recovery showed above (Table 1), in agreement with the previous literature.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…One of the more noticeable effects of cold stress in maize seedlings is the appearance of leaf necrosis (Figure ). Cold temperatures can cause leaf tissue to wilt, and over the course of several days this wilted tissue can die, resulting in changes in leaf color from green to brown and texture from healthy leaves with high turgor to dehydrated, dead leaf tissue (Guye, Vigh, & Wilson, ). The Naive Bayes color‐based classification module that was trained and implemented within PlantCV classified each plant pixel into a healthy or necrotic category that enabled the quantification of necrosis as a percentage of area belonging to each category for every plant at each time point.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the more noticeable effects of cold stress in maize seedlings is the appearance of leaf necrosis ( Figure 5). Cold temperatures can cause leaf tissue to wilt, and over the course of several days this wilted tissue can die, resulting in changes in leaf color from green to brown and texture from healthy leaves with high turgor to dehydrated, dead leaf tissue (Guye, Vigh, & Wilson, 1987). The Naive…”
Section: Impact Of Cold Stress On Leaf Necrosis Across Genotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the more noticeable effects of cold stress in maize seedlings is the appearance of leaf necrosis (Figure 5). Cold temperatures can cause leaf tissue to wilt, and over the course of several days this wilted tissue can die, resulting in changes in leaf color from green to brown and texture from healthy leaves with high turgor to dehydrated, dead leaf tissue (Guye et al, 1987). The Naive Bayes color-based classification module that was trained and implemented within PlantCV classified each plant pixel into a healthy or necrotic category that enabled the quantification of necrosis as a percentage of area belonging to each category for every plant at each time point.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%