2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery and biological oxidation of dissolved methane in effluent from UASB treatment of municipal sewage using a two-stage closed downflow hanging sponge system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with Matsuura et al (2015), who found that the dissolved methane concentration only exhibited small changes between 23.5-28°C and 14.6-24.2°C, i.e. 74 and 72 mg CH4 COD/L, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is in agreement with Matsuura et al (2015), who found that the dissolved methane concentration only exhibited small changes between 23.5-28°C and 14.6-24.2°C, i.e. 74 and 72 mg CH4 COD/L, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In this manner 72% and 86% of the dissolved methane were recovered, respectively. Two stages of DHS were applied to subsequently remove the remaining effluent dissolved methane (Matsuura et al, 2015). 58-88% of the dissolved methane was recovered in the first stage, and the residual dissolved methane was almost completely oxidized in the second stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The N 2 composition was lower compared with the values from the literature. Matsuura et al (2015) working with an UASB reactor, treating municipal sewage at ambient temperatures (10-28°C), obtained nitrogen concentrations in biogas of between 25% and 33%.…”
Section: Biogasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, during anaerobic treatments, greenhouse gas emissions are lower in comparison to aerobic technologies, if methane is used as an energy source (Bialek et al, 2014;Lew et al, 2009). On the contrary, the loss of dissolved methane in the effluent should be avoided, not only due to the loss of energy, but also because of its higher global warming potential (Matsuura et al, 2015;Smith et al, 2013). Over the past years, anaerobic membrane technology has been of growing interest and has been investigated for the treatment of different wastewaters, including municipal and industrial wastewaters (Lin et al, 2013;Ozgun et al, 2013;Skouteris et al, 2012;Smith et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%