Advances in Water Pollution Research 1964
DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4832-8391-3.50017-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery and Identification of Organics in Water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1965
1965
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He compared the degradation products and reported evidence of the aromatic and phenolic nature of the color molecules by identification of 3-methoxy-4-hydroxybenzaldehyde in oxidation mixtures of the color solids. Hoak (1962) described problems in the recovery and identification of organic substances in water. Several extraction techniques were used, and it was reported that continuous liquid-liquid extraction in a Scheibel 18-stage countercurrent column appeared to offer advantages over adsorption on carbon.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He compared the degradation products and reported evidence of the aromatic and phenolic nature of the color molecules by identification of 3-methoxy-4-hydroxybenzaldehyde in oxidation mixtures of the color solids. Hoak (1962) described problems in the recovery and identification of organic substances in water. Several extraction techniques were used, and it was reported that continuous liquid-liquid extraction in a Scheibel 18-stage countercurrent column appeared to offer advantages over adsorption on carbon.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carbon-adsorption metl id, which involves sample volumes as large as 5,000 gallons, has br^n applied with various techniques for the analysis of pesticides in wHer (Breidenbach and Lichtenberg, 1963). However, because the carbon-adsorption method is time-consuming and because recovery tends to be low and (or) quite conditional (Goodenkauf and Erdei, 1964;Grzenda and others, 1964;Hoak, 1964;Ryckman and others, 1964;Teasley and B8 Cox, 1963;Weber andMorris, 1963a, 1963b;and Wolf, 1963), attention is being given to more direct and highly sensitive techniques which can be performed with a sample of convenient size. Lovelock and Lipsky (1960) described a sensitive and seb-ctive device called an electron-affinity or electron-capture detector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%