Objective:To determine similarities and differences in key predictors of recovery of bimanual hand use and unimanual motor impairment after stroke.Method:In this prospective longitudinal study n = 89 first-ever stroke patients with arm paresis, were assessed at 3 weeks, 3 and 6 months after stroke onset. Bimanual activity performance was assessed with the Adult Assisting Hand Assessment Stroke (Ad-AHA), unimanual motor impairment with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA). Candidate predictors included shoulder abduction and finger extension measured by the corresponding FMA-items (FMA-SAFE, range 0-4) and sensory and cognitive impairment. MRI was used to measure weighted corticospinal tract lesion load (wCST-LL) and resting-state interhemispheric functional connectivity (FC).Results:Initial Ad-AHA performance was poor but improved over time in all (mild-severe) impairment subgroups. Ad-AHA correlated with FMA at each time-point (r>0.88, p<0.001) and recovery trajectories were similar. In patients with moderate-severe initial FMA, FMA-SAFE was the strongest predictor of Ad-AHA outcome (R2 = 0.81) and degree of recovery (R2 = 0.64). Two-point discrimination explained additional variance in Ad-AHA outcome (R2 = 0.05). Repeated analyses without FMA-SAFE identified wCST-LL and cognitive impairment as additional predictors. A wCST-LL above 5.5cc strongly predicted low-to-minimal FMA/Ad-AHA recovery (≤10/20p, specificity = 0.91). FC only explained some additional variance to FMA-SAFE in unimanual recovery.Conclusion:Although recovery of bimanual activity depends on the extent of CST injury and initial sensory and cognitive impairments, FMA-SAFE captures most of the variance explained by these mechanisms. FMA-SAFE, a straightforward clinical measure, strongly predicts bimanual recovery.Classification of Evidence:This study provides Class I evidence that the FMA-SAFE predicts bimanual recovery after stroke.