Recovery and trauma among urban African Americans with serious mental illness.

Abstract

Objective: Traumatic experiences are prevalent among people with serious mental illness and can significantly worsen outcomes. This study aimed to identify an urban cluster of trauma types, compare continuous distress ratings versus categorical experience of trauma for predicting outcomes such as depression and quality of life, and investigate the mediating role of recovery orientation in the impact of trauma exposure on outcomes. Method: Data came from an intervention study on African Americans with serious mental illness living in a large urban area; 212 participants completed baseline self-report measures of past trauma experiences, related distress levels, recovery, depression, and quality of life. Data were assessed using correlations and regressive path modeling. Results: Overall, 56.6% of participants reported experiences with trauma. Analyses suggested an urban cluster of trauma types that was self-reported by over 25% of participants. Distress due to trauma strongly correlated with greater depression as well as reduced quality of life and recovery. Interestingly, the categorical presence of trauma history (yes/no) had no significant relationship with any outcomes. Path analyses revealed that recovery mediated the impact of trauma distress on depression and quality of life, specifically implicating the recovery subfactor of hope. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: Results suggested that cognitive reframing focused on positive appraisals of overall recovery, and the hope subfactor can have a positive influence on trauma outcomes. The study supported the role of recovery in posttraumatic growth and suggests that hope can be used to help patients process trauma healthily. Impact and ImplicationsThis study identified a cluster of traumas commonly experienced by urban African Americans with serious mental illness. Distress ratings-but not categorical presence of trauma history-predicted outcomes of depression and reduced quality of life, mediated by cognitive appraisal of recovery and specifically the hope subfactor of hope. Practitioners might use cognitive reframing toward schemas of recovery and hope to facilitate posttraumatic growth and improve patient outcomes. Research should further examine trauma clusters and their impact on outcomes.