Recovery, conservation status, and environmental effects on arapaima populations in Guyana

Abstract

Using population estimates that were made regularly between 2001 and 2013, the state of recovery of arapaima populations and their IUCN conservation status were assessed after they were almost extirpated from the upper Essequibo basin, Guyana. Recovery rates were compared across multiple areas with different degrees of access by fishers to evaluate effectiveness of conservation efforts. Population estimates were also used to investigate the influence of environmental factors on arapaima abundance in lakes with different morphometries, vegetation, and water types and to determine the relationship between the numbers of spawning individuals and subsequent recruits (at about age 2 years). The most recent census conducted in November–December of 2013 indicated a 5.6‐fold increase in overall abundance compared with 2001, with 4,591 individuals, of which 1,932 were juveniles (1.0–1.5 m total length) and 2,659 adults. Assessment of conservation status following IUCN criteria indicated that arapaima populations in the upper Essequibo basin in 2001 would have been considered borderline Critically Endangered, but in 2013 after conservation interventions, status would be categorized as Near Threatened. Arapaima in the Essequibo basin appear to favour larger but shallow lakes with low conductivity, clear water, and abundant aquatic macrophytes. Stock–recruitment relationships suggest that the entire upper Essequibo basin population may still be growing and that there is approximately a 1:1 juvenile to adult ratio. This ratio of juveniles to adults across all areas suggests a paucity of young fishes to sustain overall population growth, which might reflect widespread illegal removals of young fishes in the basin. Comparisons of arapaima densities in the upper Essequibo basin with those at four localities across the Amazon Basin, suggest that with enhanced conservation efforts in the Essequibo, populations could potentially increase two‐fold or more.

Community‐based monitoring, assessment and management of data‐limited inland fish stocks in North Rupununi, Guyana

“…Shephard, Ryan, et al, 2021; Castello et al, 2011; Isaac & Ruffino, 1996; Petrere et al, 2004). In Guyana, the previous focus has been on Arapaima gigas (Castello, 2001; Watson et al, 2021), and to our knowledge, the broader fish community has not yet been assessed. Our results suggest that stocks in the North Rupununi are not yet strongly overfished, although evidence of loss of larger individuals is consistent with size selective exploitation.…”

“…Shephard, Ryan, et al, 2021;Castello et al, 2011;Isaac & Ruffino, 1996;Petrere et al, 2004). In Guyana, the previous focus has been on Arapaima gigas (Castello, 2001;Watson et al, 2021) The moderate state of Rupununi fish stocks contrasts with the Amazon, where some stocks have been declining for decades (Bayley & Petrere, 1989;Petrere et al, 2004) and key species show clear signs of overexploitation (Shephard, Valbo-Jorgensen, et al, 2021;Castello et al, 2011) Trenkel & Rochet, 2003).…”

Filling global gaps in monitoring data with local knowledge

“…They grow up to 3 m in length and 200 kg in weight (Arantes et al, 2010) and are obligate air‐breathers, surfacing to gulp air every few minutes (Figure 1a; Stokes et al, 2021). Arapaima dominated Amazon fisheries in the 1900s (Veríssimo, 1895), but their populations have been widely overfished, often to the point of local extinctions in recent years (Castello et al, 2015; Watson et al, 2021). Management agencies lack the resources to enforce rules of size and season of harvest and to monitor the arapaima fishery through collection of harvest statistics (Duponchelle et al, 2021).…”