2013
DOI: 10.2215/cjn.04800512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery from AKI and Short- and Long-Term Outcomes after Lung Transplantation

Abstract: SummaryBackground and objectives Patients with AKI after lung transplantation are at increased risk for CKD and death. Whether patients who completely recover from AKI have improved long-term outcome compared with patients who do not completely recover remains unknown.Design, setting, participants, & measurements This study retrospectively evaluated data on 657 patients who underwent lung transplantation from 1997 to 2009. Outcomes analyzed were the incidence of renal recovery after AKI and the association of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
48
3
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
48
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results highlight the need for a clear description of the included population (inclusion or exclusion of nonsurvivors, proportion of CKD, AKI severity, method used for baseline creatinine assessment, and proportion of patients with imputed baseline) in studies on this topic. Although one could argue that kidney outcome should be assessed in all AKI patients, the inclusion of nonsurvivors (as in [16,18,19,[22][23][24]26]) not only induces bias (as patients may not have had enough time to recover before they died) but being dead with recovered kidneys also has little significance from a patient's perspective. Since mortality increases with increasing AKI severity, exclusion of non-survivors mainly affects the recovery pattern of more severe forms of AKI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These results highlight the need for a clear description of the included population (inclusion or exclusion of nonsurvivors, proportion of CKD, AKI severity, method used for baseline creatinine assessment, and proportion of patients with imputed baseline) in studies on this topic. Although one could argue that kidney outcome should be assessed in all AKI patients, the inclusion of nonsurvivors (as in [16,18,19,[22][23][24]26]) not only induces bias (as patients may not have had enough time to recover before they died) but being dead with recovered kidneys also has little significance from a patient's perspective. Since mortality increases with increasing AKI severity, exclusion of non-survivors mainly affects the recovery pattern of more severe forms of AKI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available reports used definitions based on absence of RIFLE criteria [4,17,24], return to baseline serum creatinine (Screat) [11,19,27], or a discharge Screat that returned to a value below 1.1 or 1.25 times baseline [7,10,16,20]. Few studies reported recovery according to AKI severity [4,11,15] and none of these studies used the KDIGO criteria [28] for both diagnosis of AKI and for assessment of recovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, longterm morbidity and mortality are significantly jeopardized by chronic kidney disease (2,3). It has been shown that chronic kidney disease often originates from kidney injury acquired early after transplantation (2,3). The underlying mechanisms of acute kidney injury are incompletely unraveled, but shock, systemic inflammation and tacrolimus nephrotoxicity are considered the most important factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%