1966
DOI: 10.2307/3583558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery from Ultraviolet- and Alkylating-Agent-Induced Damage in Bacillus subtilis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1967
1967
1978
1978

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is sensitive to UV and MMS and deficient in host-cell reactivation. It is reckless in its repair of damaged DNA and recombines poorly (38,41). It is also slightly MC-sensitive.…”
Section: Jbi-49(59) Has Several Interesting Biologicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is sensitive to UV and MMS and deficient in host-cell reactivation. It is reckless in its repair of damaged DNA and recombines poorly (38,41). It is also slightly MC-sensitive.…”
Section: Jbi-49(59) Has Several Interesting Biologicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since uvrcells, which fail to excise pyrimidine dimers, are sensitive to UV but not to MMS (38), the defect in JBI-49(59) appears to be in one of the later steps in the excision-repair model sequence. The rate of DNA degradation after UV or MMS treatment is even greater for JB1-49(59) than for the wild type (39,41). As this breakdown requires metabolism for its maximum extent, it probably represents not simple autolysis of nonviable cells, but rather specific exonuclease activity.…”
Section: Jbi-49(59) Has Several Interesting Biologicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3) the sex factor and the chromosome are connected by a single DNA strand, in distinction to normal chromosome donors. Despite the presumed shortness of such a single-stranded connection, we thought it possible that transfer by such a structure might prove more sensitive to the action of agents such as X-rays and MMS which are supposed to produce single-stranded breaks in DNA (see Marcovitch, 1961;Brooks & Lawley, 1961;Strauss & Wahl, 1964;Wahl, 1965), although in the case of MMS there is evidence that part, at least, of its effect is subject to a repair process based on excision (Strauss, Reiter & Searashi, 1966;Reiter, Strauss, Robbins & Marone, 1967).…”
Section: Experiments With Rec+ and Uvr+ Escherichia Coli Mutantsmentioning
confidence: 99%