1978
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200050012x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery of 15N‐Labeled Fertilizer from Manured and Sludge‐Amended Soil

Abstract: A greenhouse pot experiment was conducted with various rates of manure (0, 20, 40, and 60 metric tons/ha) and sludge (0, 10, 20, and 30 metric tons/ha) combined factorially with 0, 50, 100, 150, and 200 mg N/kg soil as (NH4)2SO4 labeled with 15N, using barley and sudangrass as test crops. Most of the N from (NH4)2SO4 was recovered by the first cutting of barley forage (from 37.2 to 70.2%); the N from (NH4)2SO4 recovered by sudangrass, the last crop of the cropping sequence, ranged from 0.7 to 8.9%. No signific… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exchangeable NH4+ and available NO3-were determined using Keeney and Nelson (1982) method. Fertilizer nutrient use efficiency (NUE) was calculated according to following formula (Pomares-Gracia and Pratt, 1987): % NUE = (TNF -TNU) ÷ RFA x 100…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exchangeable NH4+ and available NO3-were determined using Keeney and Nelson (1982) method. Fertilizer nutrient use efficiency (NUE) was calculated according to following formula (Pomares-Gracia and Pratt, 1987): % NUE = (TNF -TNU) ÷ RFA x 100…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The filtrates were analyzed for K by AAS and UV-spectrometer for P. The concentrations of N, P and K in the plant parts were multiplied by their dry matter to obtain the amount of N, P and K taken up by the plant parts. Nitrogen, P, and K use efficiency were calculated using the subtraction method (Pomares-Gracia and Pratt, 1987). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the treatment effects and means of treatments were compared using Tukey's test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At Waseca, soil samples were dried after collection, while at Urbana, soil samples were kept frozen until time for analysis, when they were dried (50°C), ground, and analyzed for NO 3 − –N and NH 4 + –N concentration (Mulvaney, 1996). Percent recovery of the applied N was estimated by subtracting TIN in the control plot from that of the treated plots and dividing by the applied N rate (Pomares‐Garcia and Pratt, 1978).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%