2005
DOI: 10.1021/es0531778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery of Acidified European Surface Waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a hysteresis in the reversal of acidification. However, there is nowadays growing evidence that recovery is in progress, although there are also some uncertainties about how it will be in the next future (Wright et al 2005). There are for instance confounding factors related to climate change that can mask or counteract the recovery, such as increase of pCO 2 and organic acids in soil and runoff and increased sea salt atmospheric inputs.…”
Section: Surface Waters Acidificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a hysteresis in the reversal of acidification. However, there is nowadays growing evidence that recovery is in progress, although there are also some uncertainties about how it will be in the next future (Wright et al 2005). There are for instance confounding factors related to climate change that can mask or counteract the recovery, such as increase of pCO 2 and organic acids in soil and runoff and increased sea salt atmospheric inputs.…”
Section: Surface Waters Acidificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acidification, with its associated decline in salmon and trout populations, has also been a key factor in some areas, including large parts of Scandinavia (Skjelkvåle et al, 2005) and North America (Clair et al, 2011). Although Scandinavian surface waters have been recovering from acidification since the early 1990s in response to lower levels of acid deposition (Skjelkvåle et al, 2005), acid precipitation continues to exceed the critical load of many surface waters in sensitive areas such as southern Norway (Wright et al, 2005). Since forestry can contribute to acidification by leading to a net loss of base cations as a consequence of whole-tree harvesting (Akselsson et al, 2007), and maritime influence and catchment features also are important, there is not necessarily a recovery in pH associated with declines in acid precipitation (Löfgren et al 2009(Löfgren et al , 2011.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing concentrations of sulfate, nitrate, and hydrogen ions in soil solutions due to long-range transport of acidic pollutants caused reduction in acid neutralizing capacity, soil depletion of base cations, and mobilization of toxic ionic aluminum species, with adverse effects on nutrient cycling and the health of forest and aquatic ecosystems, and deleterious reduction of freshwater biodiversity (Reuss and Johnson 1986;Psenner and Catalan 1994;Driscoll et al 2001;Vrba et al 2003a). While deposition of acidifying pollutants has substantially declined in Europe and North America, particularly due to sulfur emission controls since 1980s, leading to partial recovery of surface waters from acid stress (Stoddard et al 1999), biological recovery of these areas remains remarkably delayed or uncertain (Jeffries et al 2003;Skjelkvåle et al 2003;Yan et al 2003;Wright et al 2005;Nedbalová et al 2006). Two recent reviews on plankton recovery (Graham et al 2007;Gray and Arnott 2009) discussed this lag and its possible reasons and pointed out certain gaps in our knowledge due to a lack of data and/or methodological constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%