2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.05.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery of [Au(CN) 2 ] − from gold cyanidation with graphene oxide as adsorbent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A schematic proposal to explain the Au–CN complex photocatalytic reduction is presented in Figure 7 . The first step consists of the Au(CN) 2 − anion adsorption on the composite’s surface in an aqueous solution at pH 12 [ 47 , 48 ]. In the second step, UV light irradiation starts with the generation of the electron–hole pairs and promotes the Au(CN) 2 − reduction and isopropyl alcohol oxidation, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A schematic proposal to explain the Au–CN complex photocatalytic reduction is presented in Figure 7 . The first step consists of the Au(CN) 2 − anion adsorption on the composite’s surface in an aqueous solution at pH 12 [ 47 , 48 ]. In the second step, UV light irradiation starts with the generation of the electron–hole pairs and promotes the Au(CN) 2 − reduction and isopropyl alcohol oxidation, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 The fundamental reason behind its priority is its two extraordinary features: (i) large surface area (theoretically 2630 m 2 g −1 ), 22 which aids it in offering a suitable specic area for adsorption; (ii) great extents of epoxy, hydroxyl, and carboxyl functional groups on the basal planes and edges can easily t with metal ions through the chelation mechanism or electrostatic interaction. 23,24 Therefore, in this research, graphene oxide is chosen for the adsorption of HMIs. Despite all of the unique properties of GO, there is a striking problem in that the solid GO sorbent tends to aggregate during adsorption due to p-p interactions and hence retard the adsorption phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activated carbon, one of the most common adsorbents, has been utilized to recover Au­(CN) 2 – for a long time, owing to its high surface area and well-developed porous structure . It is reported that the maximum Au­(CN) 2 – adsorption capacity of commercial activated carbon is 56 mg/g and that of sulfur-impregnated activated carbon can even reach 126 mg/g . While for Au­(S 2 O 3 ) 2 3– , activated carbon results in a weak affinity with an adsorption capacity of only 20–30 mg/g, , possibly because of the high anionic charge of the thiosulfate complex and the bulkiness of the thiosulfate ions compared to Au­(CN) 2 – .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%