1938
DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1938.123.2.326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery of Blood-Perfused Mammalian Nerves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

1949
1949
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in our experiments, followed by a supernormal period lasting for a further 5 to 15 msec., closely resembles the excitability changes reported for mammalian nerve by Gasser and Grundfest (1936) and by Graham and Lorente de No (1938). The constant presence of a supernormal period in human nerve (also noted by Brown, 1960) is of some interest as there was considerable discussion among earlier workers on the extent to which supernormality might depend upon manipulation of exposed or isolated nerve during animal experiments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…in our experiments, followed by a supernormal period lasting for a further 5 to 15 msec., closely resembles the excitability changes reported for mammalian nerve by Gasser and Grundfest (1936) and by Graham and Lorente de No (1938). The constant presence of a supernormal period in human nerve (also noted by Brown, 1960) is of some interest as there was considerable discussion among earlier workers on the extent to which supernormality might depend upon manipulation of exposed or isolated nerve during animal experiments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Increases of 10-20 %, equal to those described in the present paper, have been seen after single action potentials in the lateral giant fibres of the earthworm (Bullock, 1951). Smaller increases after single conditioning shocks have been seen in frog sciatic nerve fibres (Graham, 1934;Bullock, 1951), although there may be no increase at all when sciatic nerves are freshly excised or kept in good condition (Graham & Lorente de N6, 1938). A constancy of conduction velocity to within 1 or 2 % seems to be the rule in most fibres, apart from a brief subnormal period associated with the relative refractory period.…”
Section: The Increased Propagation Velocity After Conditioningsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Detailed studies of excitability changes also showed that under some conditions there can be periods of supernormal excitability (Adrian, 1920), but these were for some time erroneously thought to represent experimental artifacts (Graham and Lorente de No, 1938). Finally, there can be a period of prolonged decrease in excitability, termed the subnormal period.…”
Section: Short-term Dynamics Of Spike Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%