2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery of corneal sensitivity after collagen crosslinking with and without epithelial debridement in eyes with keratoconus

Abstract: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…162,164171 In a recent study comparing the recovery of corneal sensitivity following epi-off and epi-on approaches, both caused hypoesthesia, but corneal sensitivity was significantly reduced for up to 3 months after epi-off CXL and gradually returned to normal levels, while the recovery time was shorter (1 month) for eyes treated using epi-on CXL. 172 …”
Section: Correlation Of Corneal Nerve Alterations To Corneal Sensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…162,164171 In a recent study comparing the recovery of corneal sensitivity following epi-off and epi-on approaches, both caused hypoesthesia, but corneal sensitivity was significantly reduced for up to 3 months after epi-off CXL and gradually returned to normal levels, while the recovery time was shorter (1 month) for eyes treated using epi-on CXL. 172 …”
Section: Correlation Of Corneal Nerve Alterations To Corneal Sensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 23 However, the epithelium debridement is not free from complications, where there is an increased risk of ulcers, infections, haze, scarring, infiltrates, longer recovery time, patient discomfort, and postoperative pain. 24 Thus, some effort has been put into the development of transepithelial (epithelium-on, epi-on) CXL. Since riboflavin cannot penetrate intact corneal epithelium due to its chemical properties, different strategies were studied to enhance transepithelial riboflavin penetration, such as increasing riboflavin imbibition time and new riboflavin solution formulations to facilitate its transepithelial penetration.…”
Section: Corneal CXLmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a patient's perspective, keeping the epithelium is associated with less pain and discomfort and better visual function during recovery period compared to epithelium debridement before CXL. Further, corneal sensitivity was shown to recover much faster (7 days compared to 3 months) when the epithelium was not removed [23]. This is especially of concern since corneal sensitivity correlates with blinking frequency [24] and hence with lubrication of the eye, aiding in an uncomplicated recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%