2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2011.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery of duck hepatitis A virus 3 from a stable full-length infectious cDNA clone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They include duck hepatitis A virus genotypes 1 (DHAV-1; formerly duck hepatitis virus type 1) [2], 2 (DHAV-2) [3], and 3 (DHAV-3) [4], members of the species Avihepatovirus A of the genus Avihepatovirus in the family Picornaviridae [5] (http://www.picornaviridae.com/avihepatovirus/avihepatovirus.htm), and duck hepatitis virus type 2 (DHV-2) [6–8] and duck hepatitis virus type 3 (DHV-3) [9], which are currently classified within the genus Astrovirus in the family Astroviridae [10, 11]. Compared with DHV-2 and DHV-3, the three DHAV genotypes can cause more severe diseases [1, 3, 12, 13]. Among the DHAV genotypes, DHAV-1 is known to be worldwide in distribution [1]; DHAV-2 has only been reported in Taiwan, China [3]; and DHAV-3 has been found in South Korea [4], mainland China [14], and Vietnam [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They include duck hepatitis A virus genotypes 1 (DHAV-1; formerly duck hepatitis virus type 1) [2], 2 (DHAV-2) [3], and 3 (DHAV-3) [4], members of the species Avihepatovirus A of the genus Avihepatovirus in the family Picornaviridae [5] (http://www.picornaviridae.com/avihepatovirus/avihepatovirus.htm), and duck hepatitis virus type 2 (DHV-2) [6–8] and duck hepatitis virus type 3 (DHV-3) [9], which are currently classified within the genus Astrovirus in the family Astroviridae [10, 11]. Compared with DHV-2 and DHV-3, the three DHAV genotypes can cause more severe diseases [1, 3, 12, 13]. Among the DHAV genotypes, DHAV-1 is known to be worldwide in distribution [1]; DHAV-2 has only been reported in Taiwan, China [3]; and DHAV-3 has been found in South Korea [4], mainland China [14], and Vietnam [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DHAV polyprotein appears to be cleaved into three structural (VP0, VP3 and VP1) and 8–9 nonstructural (2A1, 2A2 [or 2A2, 2A3], 2B, 2C, 3A, 3B, 3C and 3D) proteins [3, 4, 1921]. Comparative sequence analysis demonstrates that DHAV-3 strains share low identity at the nucleotide (genome: 70–73%) and amino acid (polyprotein: 82–83%) level with DHAV-1 strains [4, 12, 22]. Moreover, DHAV-3 and DHAV-1 differ greatly in their genome lengths [4, 12, 1921].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reverse genetics system is particularly useful for RNA viruses since RNA genomes are difficult to manipulate directly. Although the previous research has reported about the establishment of the RNA-launched infectious clone of DHAV-1 [ 23 ] and DHAV-3 [ 24 ], the in vitro transcription will raise the operation difficulty and experiment cost. The DNA-launched infectious system possessed self-cleaving ribozyme elements at both termini of the viral genomic cDNA, which was expected to retain the authentic terminal nucleotide sequences of the viral genome [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to date, there are at least four types of viral RNA rescued system, including RNA-launched system [ 18 ], helper virus-launched system [ 19 ] and two DNA-launched systems based on cellular RNA polymerases I and II [ 20 22 ]. Although the infectious DHAV genomic RNA could be harvested in vitro from a full-length DHAV cDNA clone by the RNA-launched reverse genetics system [ 23 , 24 ], the operative strategy still depends on in vitro transcription. Compared to the RNA-launched infectious clone, the RNA polymerases II-based DNA-launched infectious system is able to generate homogenous RNA transcripts from transfected cDNA clone in vivo , allowing for higher rescue efficiency with less cost and labor by skipping in vitro RNA transcription [ 25 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%