1998
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-61.5.586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery of Foodborne Microorganisms from Potentially Lethal Radiation Damage

Abstract: A two-stage recovery protocol was examined for microorganisms following gamma irradiation in phosphate buffer at 0 degrees C. In the first stage, survivors were recovered on basal yeast extract agar and held at various temperatures suboptimal for their growth for 20 h (resuscitation protocol). In the second stage the survivors were incubated for an additional 24 h, but in this case at their optimum temperature for growth. Controls consisted of survivors which were not subjected to the resuscitation protocol (d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average D 10 values for the Salmonella cocktail were slightly greater than for Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:-alone, indicating that the cocktail was more resistant to eBeam irradiation than the Salmonella 4, [5],12:i:-serovar alone (Table 1). This is congruent with other studies showing strain/serovar variability in terms of ionizing radiation susceptibility (Lucht et al, 1998). In addition, our results showed there was consistent variation (standard deviations in Table 1) within the three individual trials for both the non-attenuated 10 MeV eBeam irradiations (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The average D 10 values for the Salmonella cocktail were slightly greater than for Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:-alone, indicating that the cocktail was more resistant to eBeam irradiation than the Salmonella 4, [5],12:i:-serovar alone (Table 1). This is congruent with other studies showing strain/serovar variability in terms of ionizing radiation susceptibility (Lucht et al, 1998). In addition, our results showed there was consistent variation (standard deviations in Table 1) within the three individual trials for both the non-attenuated 10 MeV eBeam irradiations (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Furthermore, sub-lethal dosages of irradiation (ie 43 kGy) can cause partial damage to bacteria, which will change the nutrient and physical requirements for repair and growth when stored at 4°C. 29 A lack of penetration into a dense medium such as shell eggs by EBI 27 may explain the less than absolute bactericidal effect, which contributed to viable bacterial counts observed in all irradiated eggs. Nevertheless, a 4 kGy dosage was effective at lowering all bacterial counts to an undetected level of <1 log immediately after irradiation.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Experiments 1 Bacterial Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, sub-lethal injury of microbes in response to gammaradiation treatment as well as other physical, chemical, nutritional or environmental stresses have been previously reported (Lucht, Blank, & Borsa, 1998;Moosekian, Jeong, & Ryser, 2014). In a research study on the recovery of food-borne pathogens from lethal radiation damage, it was documented that incubating radiationtreated bacteria at sub-optimal temperatures was more effective in recovering injured cells than was incubating at optimal growth temperature (Lucht et al 1998). In that study, the researchers noted that radiation exposure of P. fluorescens at 0.15 kGy followed by incubation at 22 C could result in recovery of gamma-irradiated cells.…”
Section: Producementioning
confidence: 97%