2008
DOI: 10.1080/13518470802173347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery of hidden state participation effects on oil and gas asset values

Abstract: Commodity price shocks are shown to cause shifts in both the quantity and timing of risk in natural resource assets. We provide evidence that static risk measures understate the periodicity of price risk implicit in depleting assets. Risk measurement is demonstrated to be asset specific and to vary heterogeneously in response to the combined effects of state participation and market factors. We use a global sample of oilfield assets to demonstrate that oilfield participation terms cause corporate asset cash fl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Work by Kretzschmar and Kirchner (2008) suggest that the premium will become increasingly observable when oil prices are above US$45/bbl, a finding that corroborates PSC and concession oil price volatility work by Geman (2005). Our asset and location specific findings provide evidence of variation in corporate performance anticipated by Bekaert and Harvey (2002); companies holding PSC assets demonstrate stock return under-performance relative to companies invested in concession oilfields.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Work by Kretzschmar and Kirchner (2008) suggest that the premium will become increasingly observable when oil prices are above US$45/bbl, a finding that corroborates PSC and concession oil price volatility work by Geman (2005). Our asset and location specific findings provide evidence of variation in corporate performance anticipated by Bekaert and Harvey (2002); companies holding PSC assets demonstrate stock return under-performance relative to companies invested in concession oilfields.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…We know little about the ownership of these assets nor is there much research into these closely held assets. To complicate matters the sector is often subject to political, fiscal, and economic protectionism as companies seek control of the assets needed to sustain earnings (see Kretzschmar and Kirchner (2008)). The largest and most important oil and gas reserves are state owned, directly limiting corporate access to these (Victor 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%