2015
DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2015.2447455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery of Low Rank and Jointly Sparse Matrices with Two Sampling Matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The matrix is uniquely identified, provided spark( D ) ≥ 2 k − r + 1 and the matrix Q 1 is full rank. We observe that this is the same condition we obtained in our earlier work [22]. As described earlier, this approach results in an asymmetric sampling pattern, where some frames are measured at a high rate.…”
Section: Sufficient Conditions For Subspace Aware Recovery (Step 2)supporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The matrix is uniquely identified, provided spark( D ) ≥ 2 k − r + 1 and the matrix Q 1 is full rank. We observe that this is the same condition we obtained in our earlier work [22]. As described earlier, this approach results in an asymmetric sampling pattern, where some frames are measured at a high rate.…”
Section: Sufficient Conditions For Subspace Aware Recovery (Step 2)supporting
confidence: 89%
“…As X has N columns, the total number of observations thus equals NMMVfalse(2kr+1false)N.We will show that the combined number of measurements required to estimate P and Q and hence X is considerably smaller, particularly when the rank of X is small. We also observe that our earlier work in [22] employs two measurement matrices and also requires fewer measurements than (19). We contrast the approach in this paper with that in [22] at the end of Section IV.…”
Section: Sufficient Conditions For Subspace Aware Recovery (Step 2)mentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations