2016
DOI: 10.1017/s0068246216000052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recreation or Decoration: What Were the Glass Counters From Pompeii Used For?

Abstract: This paper considers the small glass objects often called counters, which are common finds at Pompeii, and normally thought to have been used in playing games. An assemblage of over 500 stratigraphically dated examples from Insula VI.1 are examined, and the colour and size of this group are compared to a dataset of first-century AD glass counters found in graves where they can be shown with certainty to be part of gaming sets. The comparisons show that the bulk of the Pompeii counters are very unlikely to have… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, according to some views, the A.D. 62 earthquake (de ned as terminus post quem) was not a single event but other seismic activity, occurred over a certain number of years (Neronian and early Flavian periods) [27], generated stratigraphic sequence due to the subsequent demolition and rebuilding thus, suggesting that not all the glass nds have been precisely contemporaneous. All excavated specimens should have been preserved from subsequent potential deterioration caused by the eruption of Vesuvius in 79 A.D. (terminus ante quem) [21]. Dr. Piccioli, C., an o cial of the former Archaeological Superintendence of Naples and Caserta (SANC) selected the distinctive sample that was considered, according to archaeological caution, well preserved and of great signi cance, because its intense color that appeared identical to that of other intact glass manufactures.…”
Section: Archaeological Contest and Glass Sample Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, according to some views, the A.D. 62 earthquake (de ned as terminus post quem) was not a single event but other seismic activity, occurred over a certain number of years (Neronian and early Flavian periods) [27], generated stratigraphic sequence due to the subsequent demolition and rebuilding thus, suggesting that not all the glass nds have been precisely contemporaneous. All excavated specimens should have been preserved from subsequent potential deterioration caused by the eruption of Vesuvius in 79 A.D. (terminus ante quem) [21]. Dr. Piccioli, C., an o cial of the former Archaeological Superintendence of Naples and Caserta (SANC) selected the distinctive sample that was considered, according to archaeological caution, well preserved and of great signi cance, because its intense color that appeared identical to that of other intact glass manufactures.…”
Section: Archaeological Contest and Glass Sample Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These manufacturers were also described by Pliny the Helder as products of a melting recycling procedure leading to transparent, opaque, or widely colored objects, thus representing an example of glass production activities during the Roman epoch. Several studies on these nds were mainly nalized for the identi cation of coloring or opacifying compounds [18][19][20][21]. Moreover, Pompeii's excavations revealed the presence of glass production workshops probably dated before the Vesuvius eruption in 79 A.D. [12,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the generally modest decoration of the late antique churches in the southeastern Alps (Ciglenečki 2003), it is difficult to imagine what the gem from Korinjski hrib could have decorated, perhaps a book cover or a small artefact. Another possibility is that the object represents a gaming token, though these are usually somewhat larger (Cool 2016).…”
Section: Analyses In Archaeological Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%