2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-016-4018-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recreational potential as an indicator of accessibility control in protected mountain forest areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of the recreational capacity indicators exceeded 2.2 man-hour × day −1 × ha −1 what was higher than indicator calculated for suburban forests of the city of Rzeszów located within a distance of up to 20 km from its boundaries, where this value was 1.79 manhour × day −1 × ha −1 (Dudek 2016). They are also higher relative to the 4 Carpathian (mountainous) forest national parks where the calculated mean recreational capacity was from 1.93 to 2.11 man-hour × day −1 × ha −1 (Dudek 2017b). Thus far, assessments of forest recreational suitability have not taken into consideration the needs of people suffering from pollen allergies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The value of the recreational capacity indicators exceeded 2.2 man-hour × day −1 × ha −1 what was higher than indicator calculated for suburban forests of the city of Rzeszów located within a distance of up to 20 km from its boundaries, where this value was 1.79 manhour × day −1 × ha −1 (Dudek 2016). They are also higher relative to the 4 Carpathian (mountainous) forest national parks where the calculated mean recreational capacity was from 1.93 to 2.11 man-hour × day −1 × ha −1 (Dudek 2017b). Thus far, assessments of forest recreational suitability have not taken into consideration the needs of people suffering from pollen allergies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For the areas of varied orography (here TH), the third criterion, terrain Fig. 1 Map with the location of the study area; the numbers denote the sites where moss was collected and they are consistent with the numbering presented in Tables 1, 2 inclination, is taken into account, and this has also been positively tested in several upland and mountain forests of central Europe (Dudek 2013(Dudek , 2017b. In both cases (RB and TH), four auxiliary criteria were used: stand density, the presence of undergrowth and underbrush, soil cover, and stand species composition.…”
Section: Determination Of Forest Recreational Potentialmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the assessed area the age structure of tree stands with high proportion of old forests favourably impacts perception of forest landscapes and is also beneficial from the viewpoint of recreational use of forests (Kikulski, 2006;Dudek, 2017). Similarly, the distribution of the tree stands in terms of forest site humidity is favourable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eco-or biodiversity tourism has also been gaining more attention. Urban tourists with a keen interest towards nature usually select these destinations [58]. Here, dry spells increasingly lead to forest fires.…”
Section: Climate Change Impacts and The Tourism Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%