2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10826-011-9510-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recruiting and Retaining High-Risk Adolescents into Family-Based HIV Prevention Intervention Research

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of evidence-based recruitment and retention strategies for a longitudinal, family-based HIV prevention intervention study targeting adolescents in psychiatric care by (1) determining consent rate (recruitment), rate of participation at the first intervention session (retention), and follow-up attendance rate (retention); and (2) examining socio-demographic factors, family-level processes, sexual risk-related indices, and intervention factors (i.e., tre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, both family-based and individual treatment appeared to be equally appealing to families who did not experience problematic family functioning. It should also be noted that although some of the research in the field suggests that high externalizing symptoms might lead to fewer sessions whereas high internalizing might lead to higher numbers of sessions (Flannery-Schroeder et al, 2005;Galaif et al, 2001;Kapungo et al, 2011), within each of our profiles, internalizing and externalizing symptoms tended to move together, leading to families being categorized as showing either high or low adolescent psychiatric symptoms.…”
Section: Profiles Of Families Emerging From the Analysesmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other words, both family-based and individual treatment appeared to be equally appealing to families who did not experience problematic family functioning. It should also be noted that although some of the research in the field suggests that high externalizing symptoms might lead to fewer sessions whereas high internalizing might lead to higher numbers of sessions (Flannery-Schroeder et al, 2005;Galaif et al, 2001;Kapungo et al, 2011), within each of our profiles, internalizing and externalizing symptoms tended to move together, leading to families being categorized as showing either high or low adolescent psychiatric symptoms.…”
Section: Profiles Of Families Emerging From the Analysesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Empirical findings have been mixed on whether psychiatric symptoms affect treatment retention (Neumann et al, 2010). In psychosocial treatments for externalizing behaviors, higher problem severity has been linked to greater attrition (Galaif, Hser, Grella, & Joshi, 2001;Kapungo et al, 2011). Conversely, lower severity of internalizing behaviors has been related to greater attrition (Flannery-Schroeder, Choudhury, & Kendall, 2005).…”
Section: Predictors Of Premature Terminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strategy 1: Flexible Scheduling.-Time conflicts are frequently cited retention barriers (Kapungu et al, 2012;Pescud et al, 2015). Flexible scheduling is vital and at times requires staff willing to work evenings and weekends.…”
Section: Retention Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both adolescents and low-income, minority adults face significant barriers to research participation. Barriers for adolescents include family/parental conflict, psychosocial stressors, time constraints, and peer stigma (Kapungu et al, 2012;Kealey et al, 2006;Rait et al, 2015). Barriers for low-income, minority adults include mistrust of research, economic and time constraints, unstable housing, lack of childcare, disease burden, and transportation (Ejiogu et al, 2011;Kim et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies with the current sample have documented the influence of family factors on adolescent risk behavior (Hadley et al, 2009; Kapungu et al, 2012; Nappi et al, 2009), so we have chosen to focus on the relationships among psychopathology, personal, peer, and partner factors and youths’ sexual attitudes. We hypothesized that adolescent psychopathology (i.e., psychiatric impairment), would be associated with peer and partner relationships concerns (i.e., peer norms, partner rejection sensitivity) and individual (i.e., HIV-knowledge, and perceived vulnerability) factors.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%