2017
DOI: 10.29115/sp-2017-0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recruiting Hard-to-Reach Populations: The Utility of Facebook for Recruiting Qualitative In-Depth Interviewees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Central is the recruitment bias associated with using Facebook for this sample. As previously detailed elsewhere (Weiner et al ), recruitment bias takes two forms. This first is undercoverage in that this study by design excluded non‐Facebook users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Central is the recruitment bias associated with using Facebook for this sample. As previously detailed elsewhere (Weiner et al ), recruitment bias takes two forms. This first is undercoverage in that this study by design excluded non‐Facebook users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes these individuals difficult to find, recruit, and sample using traditional methods (Tourangeau ). I therefore used the social networking site Facebook for recruitment purposes (Weiner et al ), a method that is now becoming more common in scholarly research (Rife et al. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recruitment through social media, such as Facebook, is considered a cost-efficient methodology to recruit otherwise hard-to-reach populations (Weiner et al, 2017). Through social media private messaging and after 'blinding' all her social media accounts, at the time of writing the researcher contacted 30 administrators and moderators of social media groups and pages pivoting around (and disseminating) potentially harmful health-related misinformation.…”
Section: Case Study Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facebook is considered the most popular social networking site in the United States and is used by an estimated 68% of American adults (Smith & Anderson, 2018). In recent years, Facebook has been found to be an effective recruiting tool for health-related research, including clinical trials and intervention studies (Choi et al, 2017; Weiner, Puniello, Siracusa, & Crowley, 2017). The advantages of using Facebook for research include timely data collection, low cost, less effort spent on recruitment, wider coverage of the study population, broader geographic range, and ability to reach populations that are small in number or require specific eligibility criteria (Cope, 2014; Sikkens, van San, Sieckelinck, Boeije, & de Winter, 2017; Weiner et al, 2017; Whitaker, Stevelink, & Fear, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%