2014
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciu726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recruitment and Retention of Pregnant Women Into Clinical Research Trials: An Overview of Challenges, Facilitators, and Best Practices

Abstract: Pregnant women are a vulnerable group who are needed in clinical research studies to advance prevention and treatment options for this population. Yet, pregnant women remain underrepresented in clinical research. Through the lens of the socioecological model, we highlight reported barriers and facilitators to recruitment and retention of pregnant women in studies that sought their participation. We trace historical, policy-based reasons for the exclusion of pregnant women in clinical studies to present-day rat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
118
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
7
118
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Effective techniques for recruiting hard to reach populations like pregnant smokers include providing an incentive [18][19][20][21] and targeting recruitment messages and materials to the population [5,[22][23][24]. Using emotion to frame messages may be an effective form of targeting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective techniques for recruiting hard to reach populations like pregnant smokers include providing an incentive [18][19][20][21] and targeting recruitment messages and materials to the population [5,[22][23][24]. Using emotion to frame messages may be an effective form of targeting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second limitation was the high drop-out rate experienced along the study, especially in the control group, resulting in a smaller sample size, larger confidence intervals of the results and lower statistical power. Conducting clinical trials in mother-infant pairs is not evident and retaining them into the study during the entire study period is challenging [32]. Since the study was conducted in one province in Belgium, the study should be repeated in other provinces and countries with a different epidemiological background, a different vaccination schedule and different vaccine compositions, before generalizations can be made.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of studies ( n = 13) in this review were case studies. The remaining studies included quantitative design (Bloom et al., ; Chandra et al., ; Geist, ; Glik et al., ; Goytia et al., ; Patterson et al., ); qualitative design (Boutain & McNees, ; Burkhalter et al., ; Collignon, Men, & Tan, ; Honeycutt et al., ; Johnson et al., ; Radermacher, Karunarathna, Grace, & Feldman, ; Taras et al., ); systematic review (Frew et al., ); and mixed‐method design (Houston et al., ; Kakietek et al., ; Kelaher et al., ; Laborde, Brannock, Breland‐Noble, & Parrish, ; Riehman et al., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%