2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recruitment of Rod Photoreceptors from Short-Wavelength-Sensitive Cones during the Evolution of Nocturnal Vision in Mammals

Abstract: Summary Vertebrate ancestors had only cone-like photoreceptors. The duplex retina evolved in jawless vertebrates with the advent of highly photosensitive rod-like photoreceptors. Despite cones being the arbiters of high-resolution color vision, rods emerged as the dominant photoreceptor in mammals during a nocturnal phase early in their evolution. We investigated the evolutionary and developmental origins of rods in two divergent vertebrate retinae. In mice, we discovered genetic and epigenetic vestiges of sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
125
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
15
125
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the significantly altered transcripts in P8 Opn4 DTA/DTA versus wild-type retinas, the dopamine receptor D 4 (Drd4) appeared to be a good candidate, showing significantly reduced expression (Figure 2B). DRD4 expression was confirmed to be expressed in cones in four separate transcriptional datasets (Hughes et al, 2017; Kim et al, 2016; Mo et al, 2016; Siegert et al, 2012). In the mature retina, ipRGCs are known to influence cone photoreceptor light adaptation by controlling dopamine (DA) release from dopaminergic amacrine cells (DACs) (Prigge et al, 2016; Zhang et al, 2008a), an effect dependent on the expression of DRD4 (Jackson et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Among the significantly altered transcripts in P8 Opn4 DTA/DTA versus wild-type retinas, the dopamine receptor D 4 (Drd4) appeared to be a good candidate, showing significantly reduced expression (Figure 2B). DRD4 expression was confirmed to be expressed in cones in four separate transcriptional datasets (Hughes et al, 2017; Kim et al, 2016; Mo et al, 2016; Siegert et al, 2012). In the mature retina, ipRGCs are known to influence cone photoreceptor light adaptation by controlling dopamine (DA) release from dopaminergic amacrine cells (DACs) (Prigge et al, 2016; Zhang et al, 2008a), an effect dependent on the expression of DRD4 (Jackson et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…2D, Step 2 )(132, 152-154). Recent evolutionary studies suggest that mammalian S-cone and rod PRs may have similar lineages, and may temporally switch from S-cone precursors to rods(155). …”
Section: The Gene-regulatory Network Controlling Pr Specification Shmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore imperative that we elucidate global profiles of transcriptome and epigenome, together with those of lncRNA, miRNA and other noncoding transcribed sequences, under normal (control) and abnormal (disease) conditions focusing on different cell types in the retina/eye and generate gene interaction networks. While a majority of reported NGS data in retina/eye originates from small number of samples and whole tissues (Farkas et al, 2013; Tian et al, 2015), several groups have initiated NGS studies on specific cell types (Macosko et al, 2015; Mo et al, 2016; Siegert et al, 2012)(Kim et al, 2016). An array of NGS data thus provides unprecedented opportunities to address fundamental questions related to gene/genome organization, function and regulation, which in turn would dramatically influence our understanding of cell physiology and pathogenic mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, whole tissue histone modification data might miss valuable epigenetic information on low expressed genes and those expressed in minor cell types, and such studies should be performed with purified cell types (Kim et al, 2016). New methods have been developed to perform single cell ChIP-seq experiments (Rotem et al, 2015).…”
Section: Epigenomementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation