1998
DOI: 10.1179/026708398790290578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recrystallisation rates in austenite measured by double compression and stress relaxation methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Stress relaxation has been shown to be an effective method to determine the recrystallization kinetics in hot-deformed austenite and utilized extensively. 18,19) Advantages of the method compared to conventional double-hit techniques are that a single test provides a complete recrystallized fraction vs time curve and that the static recovery can de distinguished from the static recrystallization. Also, very fast metadynamic recrystallization kinetics can be recorded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stress relaxation has been shown to be an effective method to determine the recrystallization kinetics in hot-deformed austenite and utilized extensively. 18,19) Advantages of the method compared to conventional double-hit techniques are that a single test provides a complete recrystallized fraction vs time curve and that the static recovery can de distinguished from the static recrystallization. Also, very fast metadynamic recrystallization kinetics can be recorded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flow stress at 5 % total reloading strain was adopted in computing the recrystallized fraction to exclude the effect of recovery from the softening data, as described elsewhere. 9) Microstructures were examined in an optical microscope (OM) as well as in a scanning electron microscope equipped with an electron back-scattered diffraction device (SEM-EBSD).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate SRx of austenite, the stress relaxation method (Zisman et al 2012;Perttula & Karjalainen 1998) was implemented on a Gleeble 3800 simulator. The selected degrees of 0.25 and 0.10 of single strains correspond, respectively, to the maximum thickness reduction during rough rolling and the average reduction in finish rolling of the investigated steels.…”
Section: Static Recrystallization Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selected degrees of 0.25 and 0.10 of single strains correspond, respectively, to the maximum thickness reduction during rough rolling and the average reduction in finish rolling of the investigated steels. Distinct changes in the softening rate dσ/dt allow determination of the incubation period of SRx and the time span of its primary stage (Zisman et al 2012;Perttula & Karjalainen 1998). Stress relaxation curves for austenite of F620 alloyed with V and Nb, correspondingly, are indicated in Figs.…”
Section: Static Recrystallization Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%