2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtla.2021.101236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recrystallization kinetics, mechanisms, and topology in alloys processed by laser powder-bed fusion: AISI 316L stainless steel as example

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For longer annealing times, the hardness levels out indicating that recrystallization is completed at less than 4 h at this temperature. Compared to our preceding work [45], where the recrystallization kinetics did not follow the JMAK behavior, the present study exhibits faster recrystallization kinetics (incomplete recrystallization after annealing at 1150 °C for 8 h in our previous study). The likely reason for such differences is the higher number density of recrystallized grains in the present study.…”
Section: Annealing Behavior Of As-built Samplescontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For longer annealing times, the hardness levels out indicating that recrystallization is completed at less than 4 h at this temperature. Compared to our preceding work [45], where the recrystallization kinetics did not follow the JMAK behavior, the present study exhibits faster recrystallization kinetics (incomplete recrystallization after annealing at 1150 °C for 8 h in our previous study). The likely reason for such differences is the higher number density of recrystallized grains in the present study.…”
Section: Annealing Behavior Of As-built Samplescontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Compared to 304L grade, 316L stainless steel is less prone to undergo static recovery due to the high thermal stability resulting from Mo segregation at cell walls [21] and low-to-medium stacking fault energy of 33 mJ/m 2 [77]. Therefore, the low Avrami exponent of n = 1.16, herein observed, can be explained by the preferential nucleation and growth along the build tracks, restraining their growth along the transverse/building direction, as the build tracks exhibit higher dislocation density and higher local misorientation [45]. As a result, elongated recrystallized grains are observed in Fig.…”
Section: Annealing Behavior Of As-built Samplesmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations