Recrystallization Texture and Young's Modulus of Ceramic Particle Dispersed Ferrite Steel Bars

Yamamoto, Sumio; Asabe, Kazutaka; Nishiguchi, Masaru; Maehara, Yasuhiro

doi:10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.82.9_771

Cited by 27 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Consider that fcc-to-bcc transformation involves lattice displacement comprising two ways of atomic movement, notably [ [43,46], and E I , E II and E III are 0.139 (expansion), 0.07 (contraction) and 0.014 (contraction), respectively [43,46]. The approximate increase in elastic strain energy using Eq.…”

Section: Tem Of the Morphology Of Plastic Zone As A Function Of Straimentioning

confidence: 99%

Interplay between grain structure, deformation mechanisms and austenite stability in phase-reversion-induced nanograined/ultrafine-grained austenitic ferrous alloy

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Tem Of the Morphology Of Plastic Zone As A Function Of Straimentioning

confidence: 99%

Interplay between grain structure, deformation mechanisms and austenite stability in phase-reversion-induced nanograined/ultrafine-grained austenitic ferrous alloy

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In the case of transformation from austenite to martensite by a single variant mode, the increase in elastic strain energy can be estimated using the follow equation [33,34]. as the retained austenite grain size increases from $ 100 nm to $ 500 nm, showing a greater transformation resistance needed to be overcome for fine retained austenite grains.…”

Section: Effects Of Austenite Characteristics On Deformation Behaviormentioning

confidence: 99%

Combination of ductility and toughness by the design of fine ferrite/tempered martensite–austenite microstructure in a low carbon medium manganese alloyed steel plate

Chen

Liu

et al. 2015

Materials Science and Engineering: A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Thus, E I , E II , and E III are 132.1 GPa, 220.8 GPa, and 220.8 GPa, respectively, 6) and " I , " II , and " III are 0.139 (expansion), 0.07 (contraction) and 0.014 (contraction), respectively. The estimated increment in elastic strain energy is calculated at about 1839 MJ/m 3 from the Eq.…”

Section: Elastic Strain Energy For Lattice Displacementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Grain Refinement on Thermal Stability of Metastable Austenitic Steel

et al. 2004

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In martensitic steels, it is well known that a certain chemical driving force (about 180 MJ/m 3 ) is required to start martensitic transformation (Ms), and additional driving force has to be charged further to complete the transformation (Mf). In the case of metastable austenitic steels with Ms temperature at around room temperature, however, only the chemical driving force needed to start martensitic transformation has been stored at room temperature. Hence, the state of austenite is very unstable thermally. It has already been known that such a metastable austenite undergoes a partial martensitic transformation during isothermal holding at room temperature or cooling to a low temperature. It is very convenient to investigate the behavior of martensitic transformation of austenite. In this study, the effect of austenite grain size on martensitic transformation is introduced from the viewpoint of microstructural analysis and thermo-dynamics. The steel used in this investigation is an Fe-16 mass%Cr-10 mass%Ni ternary alloy, which has Ms temperature at around room temperature. The grain size of this steel can be controlled from 0.8 mm to 80 mm using the technique of reversion of deformation induced martensite. In the material with coarse grain size (80 mm), about 18% of martensite was detected at room temperature and the amount of martensite was increased to 50% by the following subzero treatment to 77 K. However, martensite was hardly detected in the material with ultra fine grains (0.8 mm) even after the subzero treatment. It was found that such a stabilization occurs in the materials with the grain size below 10 mm and the stabilization was reasonably explained by considering the relation between austenite grain size and elastic strain energy which is required on the single variant martensitic transformation.

show abstract

Recrystallization Texture and Young's Modulus of Ceramic Particle Dispersed Ferrite Steel Bars

Cited by 27 publications

References 0 publications

Interplay between grain structure, deformation mechanisms and austenite stability in phase-reversion-induced nanograined/ultrafine-grained austenitic ferrous alloy

Interplay between grain structure, deformation mechanisms and austenite stability in phase-reversion-induced nanograined/ultrafine-grained austenitic ferrous alloy

Combination of ductility and toughness by the design of fine ferrite/tempered martensite–austenite microstructure in a low carbon medium manganese alloyed steel plate

Effect of Grain Refinement on Thermal Stability of Metastable Austenitic Steel

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About