2016
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.12.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rectal Indomethacin Does Not Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in Consecutive Patients

Abstract: Background & Aims Rectal indomethacin, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, is given to prevent pancreatitis in high-risk patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), based on findings from clinical trials. European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines recently recommended prophylactic rectal indomethacin for all patients undergoing ERCP, including those at average risk for pancreatitis. We performed a randomized controlled trail to investigate the efficacy of this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
194
3
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
194
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A theoretical advantage of intravenous injection of NSAIDs, compared to the rectal route, could be the complete absorption of the drug; rectal absorption may be incomplete for anatomical reasons and rectal gas expulsion after the procedure because of air insufflation, which could even lead to expulsion of the suppository [22]; both these issues should be overcome by intravenous injection. However, despite recent doubts about usefulness of NSAIDs in preventing PEP [13], rectal but not intravenous NSAIDs seemed to be effective for this purpose, suggesting the importance of the route of administration to prevent this complication. As reported by Sotoudehmanesh et al [23], the plasma half-life of indomethacin administered as a suppository is 4.5 h which should be adequate to influence the initial cellular activation of the pancreatic reaction after ERCP (within an appropriate therapeutic window; it should be adequate when PEP occurs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A theoretical advantage of intravenous injection of NSAIDs, compared to the rectal route, could be the complete absorption of the drug; rectal absorption may be incomplete for anatomical reasons and rectal gas expulsion after the procedure because of air insufflation, which could even lead to expulsion of the suppository [22]; both these issues should be overcome by intravenous injection. However, despite recent doubts about usefulness of NSAIDs in preventing PEP [13], rectal but not intravenous NSAIDs seemed to be effective for this purpose, suggesting the importance of the route of administration to prevent this complication. As reported by Sotoudehmanesh et al [23], the plasma half-life of indomethacin administered as a suppository is 4.5 h which should be adequate to influence the initial cellular activation of the pancreatic reaction after ERCP (within an appropriate therapeutic window; it should be adequate when PEP occurs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Based on these data recent European guidelines recommend the routine rectal administration of 100 mg of diclofenac or indomethacin in all patients, if there are no contraindications, immediately before or after ERCP to reduce the risk of PEP [8]. However, surprisingly, a recent randomized controlled trial showed that rectal indomethacin was ineffective for PEP prevention [13] suggesting that NSAIDs alone may not be sufficient in chemoprevention of this complication. NSAIDs delivered orally (diclofenac) [14], intramuscularly (diclofenac) [15][16], or intravenously (i.v.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent PRCT by Levenick et al 38 reported that RNSAIDs did not protect against PEP in consecutive patients undergoing ERCP, the majority of which were average-risk patients. The overall rates for PEP after placebo (4.9%) were similar to that after RNSAID (7.2%).…”
Section: Post-ercp Prophylaxismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…11,13,32,35,36 When pancreatography is completely avoided, PEP should be very uncommon (< 3%). 13,37,38 Reasonable definitions for difficult cannulation range from cannulation attempts for > 5-10 minutes, > 5-15 cannulation attempts, and/or > 1-5 inadvertent pancreatic duct manipulations. 11,29,31 In situations where biliary cannulation is difficult and repeated pancreatic cannulation occurs, some experts advocate a double guidewire technique (DGWT) to increase success.…”
Section: Procedures Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the randomized trials, only one was conducted in the United States ( 14 ) and that trial consisted largely of patients with SOD type III, a now defunct indication for ERCP. However, earlier this year, Levenik et al ( 15 ) published a randomized trial in unselected consecutive ERCP at showing no statistical diff erence in the indomethacin group when compared with placebo.…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%