2007
DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)32594-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rectal Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin in the Management of the Third Stage of Labour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
7
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Aghazadeh Naini (2014) detected no difference in side effects between the 2 groups (19). Our study showed no significant differences between drug side effects such as fever, uterine tonus, and nausea in the 2 groups, but shivering in misoprostol group was significantly higher than the other group, and this finding has also been reported previously (4,7,(20)(21)(22)(23)(24). In Chaudhuri et al (2010) study, in patients that received misoprostol, shivering was a common side effect (4) although 800 µg rectal misoprostol had lower shivering (8.33%) than our study (39.6%), which can be related to its pharmacokinetic effect in rectal administration versus sublingual (25).…”
Section: Beigi Et Al (2009) In a Clinical Trial On 542 Nulliparous Wsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, Aghazadeh Naini (2014) detected no difference in side effects between the 2 groups (19). Our study showed no significant differences between drug side effects such as fever, uterine tonus, and nausea in the 2 groups, but shivering in misoprostol group was significantly higher than the other group, and this finding has also been reported previously (4,7,(20)(21)(22)(23)(24). In Chaudhuri et al (2010) study, in patients that received misoprostol, shivering was a common side effect (4) although 800 µg rectal misoprostol had lower shivering (8.33%) than our study (39.6%), which can be related to its pharmacokinetic effect in rectal administration versus sublingual (25).…”
Section: Beigi Et Al (2009) In a Clinical Trial On 542 Nulliparous Wsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…blood loss of 500 ml) and found that ergometrine-oxytocin was associated with small reduction in the risk of PPH (odds ratio = 0.82) but more of nausea, vomiting and hypertension. Parson et al [11] compared rectal misoprostol 800 lg versus oxytocin 10 IU intramuscular with delivery of anterior shoulder. The results were compared in terms of change in haemoglobin concentration before and after delivery, need of additional oxytocics, estimated blood loss, transfusion and medication side-effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, 400 μg of misoprostol administered orally has been compared with intravenous or intramuscular oxytocin in smaller hospital-based randomized controlled trials [3,7]. In addition, 800 μg of rectal misoprostol has also been evaluated for PPH prophylaxis [9,10]. Although promising results have been obtained in almost all studies, a Cochrane review concluded that there is no consensus regarding the optimal route and dose of misoprostol [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well absorbed when administered by oral, vaginal, sublingual, rectal, and buccal routes. Oral [3][4][5][6][7][8] and rectal [9,10] administration of misoprostol has been found to be effective in preventing and controlling PPH in various studies. Although misoprostol has been included recently in the WHO essential medicine list, the lowest effective dose and the optimal route of administration for maximum benefit and minimum adverse effects is yet to be established [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%